Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk of coronary heart disease among Japanese men and women: The Circulatory Risk in Communities Study (CIRCS)
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to assess the association between serum LDL-cholesterol levels and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) among Japanese who have lower means of LDL-cholesterol than Western populations.Methods The predictive power of estimated serum LDL-cholesterol levels in casual blood samples for risk of CHD was evaluated among residents from four Japanese communities participating in the Circulatory Risk in Communities Study (CIRCS). A total of 8131 men and women, aged 40 to 69 years with no history of stroke or CHD, completed baseline risk factor surveys between 1975 and 1987. By 2003, 155 cases of incident CHD (myocardial infarction, angina pectoris and sudden cardiac death) had been identified.Results Mean LDL-cholesterol values were 99.4 mg/dL for men and 109.4 mg/dL for women. The crude incidence rate (per 100,000 person-years) of CHD was 152.0 for men and 51.9 for women. The respective multivariable hazard ratios for ≥ 140 mg/dL versus <80mg/dL LDL-cholesterol were 2.80 (95% confidence interval: 1.59 to 4.92) for total CHD, 3.83 (1.78-8.23) for myocardial infarction, 4.07 (2.02-8.20) for non-fatal CHD, and 1.24 (0.44-3.47) for fatal CHD.Conclusion Serum LDL-cholesterol levels ranging from around 80 mg/dL to 200mg/dL were positively associated with risk of CHD in a Japanese population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The increase in hazard ratio for CAD incidence and mortality following LDL-C elevation has been validated in Japanese cohort studies.
“the increase in hazard ratio for the CAD incidence and mortality following an elevation in LDL-C has been validated in cohort studies involving the Japanese36–40).”
From Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases 2017 (2018) · cites this paper as [37]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Imano, H., Noda, H., Kitamura, A., Sato, S., Kiyama, M., Sankai, T., Ohira, T., Nakamura, M., Yamagishi, K., Ikeda, A., Shimamoto, T., & Iso, H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Osaka University Hospital (JP)
- Chiba Prefectural Institute of Public Health (JP)
- University of Tsukuba (JP)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Imano, Hironori
- ORCID
- Venue
- Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 381-386
- ISSN
- 0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034652497
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- LDL cholesterol, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk, Japanese population, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, sudden cardiac death, serum cholesterol, sex differences, Circulatory Risk in Communities Study
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Coronary Disease, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Japan, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review