How many deaths are attributable to smoking in the United States? Comparison of methods for estimating smoking-attributable mortality when smoking prevalence changes
Abstract
Background The number of smoking-attributable deaths is commonly estimated using current and former smoking prevalences or lung cancer mortality as an indirect metric of cumulative population smoking. Neither method accounts for differences in the timing with which relative risks (RRs) for different diseases change following smoking initiation and cessation. We aimed to develop a method to account for time-dependent RRs.Methods We used birth cohort lung cancer mortality and its change over time to characterize time-varying cumulative smoking exposure. We analyzed data from the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II to estimate RRs for disease-specific mortality associated with current and former smoking, and change in RRs over time after cessation.Results When lung cancer was used to measure cumulative smoking exposure, 254,700 male and 227,000 female deaths were attributed to smoking in the US in 2005. A modified method in which RRs for different diseases decreased at different rates after cessation yielded similar but slightly lower estimates [251,900 (male) and 221,100 (female)]. The lowest estimates resulted from the method based on smoking prevalence [225,800 (male) and 163,700 (female)].Conclusions Although all methods estimated a large number of smoking attributable deaths, future efforts should account for temporal changes in smoking prevalence and in accumulation/reversibility of disease-specific risks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In cohort analyses using narrow age bands, the 95% confidence interval for smoking's effect on stroke includes 1.0 in several age groups.
“although smoking is an established cause of cardiovascular diseases, when cohorts are analysed in fine age groups, the 95% CI for the effect of smoking on stroke spans 1·0 in several age groups.38”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Oza, S., Thun, M. J., Henley, S. J., Lopez, A. D., & Ezzati, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- American Cancer Society (US)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ezzati, Majid
- Venue
- Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 428-433
- ISSN
- 0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063360446
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- smoking-attributable mortality, smoking cessation, cumulative smoking exposure, lung cancer mortality, birth cohort analysis, disease-specific mortality, smoking prevalence, Cancer Prevention Study II
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, American Cancer Society, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Risk, Smoking, Time Factors, United States, Prevalence, Smoking Cessation, Sex Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review