Electronic screen use and selected somatic symptoms in 10–12year old children
Abstract
Objective Screen-based media use by children and adolescents has increased in recent years but the consequences of their use are not well understood. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive examination of the relationship between screen-based activities and a selection of single and multiple self-reported somatic symptoms in a large sample of 10-12 year old children.Method We use data from the population-based 2011 Youth in Iceland school survey (N=10,829, response rate: 84.5%, boys: 49.9%) that is conducted triennially in 5th-7th grades in all secondary schools in Iceland. Self-reported measures of common screen-based activities were hypothesized to predict the odds of dizziness, tremors, headaches, stomach aches, and multiple symptoms.Results In general the reported prevalence of symptoms increased with greater number of hours reported on screen based activity for boys and girls. This held for all individual screen activities as well as the cumulative measure of daily minutes spent on screen-based media and prevalence of one or more somatic symptoms.Conclusions This study confirms previous findings and puts forth additional information concerning the relationship between the prevalence of electronic screen use and somatic symptoms in 10-12 year old children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior cross-sectional studies have mostly found a positive association between screen time and somatic symptoms in children, adolescents, and young adults.
“Prior cross-sectional studies have examined the relationship between screen time and somatic symptoms in children, adolescents, and young adults [60–66], with the majority finding a positive association between screen time and somatic symptoms.”
From Screen time and mental health: a prospective analysis of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (2024) · cites this paper as [65]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Taehtinen, R. E., Sigfusdottir, I. D., Helgason, A. R., & Kristjansson, A. L.
- Venue
- Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 128-133
- ISSN
- 0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091641720
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- screen media, somatic symptoms, children, adolescents, dizziness, headache, abdominal pain, tremor, self-reported symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Child Behavior, Computers, Dizziness, Female, Headache, Humans, Iceland, Male, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Television, Time Factors, Tremor, Video Games, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review