Cited by 25Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPhysical Activity and Health

Electronic screen use and selected somatic symptoms in 10–12year old children

Taehtinen, Richard E., Sigfusdottir, Inga Dora, Helgason, Asgeir R., Kristjansson, Alfgeir L.·2014·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objective Screen-based media use by children and adolescents has increased in recent years but the consequences of their use are not well understood. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive examination of the relationship between screen-based activities and a selection of single and multiple self-reported somatic symptoms in a large sample of 10-12 year old children.Method We use data from the population-based 2011 Youth in Iceland school survey (N=10,829, response rate: 84.5%, boys: 49.9%) that is conducted triennially in 5th-7th grades in all secondary schools in Iceland. Self-reported measures of common screen-based activities were hypothesized to predict the odds of dizziness, tremors, headaches, stomach aches, and multiple symptoms.Results In general the reported prevalence of symptoms increased with greater number of hours reported on screen based activity for boys and girls. This held for all individual screen activities as well as the cumulative measure of daily minutes spent on screen-based media and prevalence of one or more somatic symptoms.Conclusions This study confirms previous findings and puts forth additional information concerning the relationship between the prevalence of electronic screen use and somatic symptoms in 10-12 year old children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior cross-sectional studies have mostly found a positive association between screen time and somatic symptoms in children, adolescents, and young adults.

    “Prior cross-sectional studies have examined the relationship between screen time and somatic symptoms in children, adolescents, and young adults [60–66], with the majority finding a positive association between screen time and somatic symptoms.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 25

Authors
Taehtinen, R. E., Sigfusdottir, I. D., Helgason, A. R., & Kristjansson, A. L.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
67
Pages
128-133
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091641720
Cited by
25
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
screen media, somatic symptoms, children, adolescents, dizziness, headache, abdominal pain, tremor, self-reported symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Child Behavior, Computers, Dizziness, Female, Headache, Humans, Iceland, Male, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Television, Time Factors, Tremor, Video Games, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review