Evaluation of physical activity reporting in community Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention efforts: a systematic review
Abstract
Introduction The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle intervention has been translated to community settings using the DPP goals of 7% weight loss and 150min of moderate physical activity (PA) per week. Given that PA is a primary lifestyle goal and has been linked to improvements in metabolic health in the DPP, it is important to understand the role that PA plays in translation effort success. The purpose of this review is to thoroughly evaluate the reporting of PA methodology and results in DPP-based translations in order to guide future prevention efforts.Methods PubMed and Ovid databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed original research articles on DPP-based translations for adults at-risk for developing diabetes or cardiovascular disease, limited to English language publications from January 2002-March 2015.Results 72 original research articles describing 57 translation studies met eligibility criteria. All 57 study interventions included a PA goal, 47 studies (82%) collected participant PA information, and 34 (60%) provided PA results.Conclusions Despite PA being a primary intervention goal, PA methodology and results are under-reported in published DPP translation studies. This absence and inconsistency in reporting PA needs addressed in order to fully understand translation efforts' impact on participant health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A review of community translation studies documented that only about one-half of published studies include physical activity change in their results, making it difficult to assess the impact of activity on health outcomes in these translation efforts.
“Although these community translation studies have adapted the same DPP lifestyle goals of weight loss and increased activity, a review of the translation literature documented that only about onehalf of these published studies include PA change in their results (24), making it difficult to assess the impact of activity on health outcomes in these translation efforts.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Eaglehouse, Y. L., Kramer, M. K., Rockette-Wagner, B., Arena, V. C., & Kriska, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eaglehouse, Yvonne L.
- Venue
- Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 191-199
- ISSN
- 0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W608363730
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Diabetes Association
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- physical activity, Diabetes Prevention Program, lifestyle intervention, diabetes prevention, cardiovascular disease prevention, weight loss, at-risk adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Community Health Services, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Health Education, Humans, Life Style, Male, Preventive Medicine, Public Health, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review