Dollar for Dollar: Racial and ethnic inequalities in health and health-related outcomes among persons with very high income
Abstract
Racial and ethnic disparities in health have been well-documented, and low SES is widely considered to be a driver of this relationship. However, the race-social class-health interrelationship is complex, as several studies have found race disparities between racial/ethnic minorities and whites at middle- income levels. Research on higher income persons is complicated by the lack of data for persons with incomes about $75,000. Most national datasets collect income data in categories with the highest income category being $75,000 and above. In our study, we examined racial/ethnic disparities in health status and behaviors among persons of very high income, reported income of $175,000 or above per year. Data are from the Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS). Our findings revealed health disparities in 10 of the 16 health-related outcomes selected. African Americans were most dissimilar to whites at this income and with disadvantages on 6 health outcomes relative to whites. While results also showed some disparities for Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans relative to whites, these groups were advantaged, relative to whites on several health outcomes. Our findings indicate that income does not fully explain racial/ethnic disparities in health. Most public interventions are targeted to low income persons. However, public health interventions should target minority individuals of very high income as well, especially African Americans.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Black Americans with high socioeconomic status report worse physical health status compared to white Americans with similar resources.
“Prior studies have demonstrated that Black Americans with high SES report worse physical health status, measured by various indicators (i.e., diabetes, hypertension, self-rated health), compared to white Americans with similar resources (Farmer and Ferraro 2005; Wilson, Thorpe, and LaVeist 2017).”
From Is John Henryism a Health Risk or Resource?: Exploring the Role of Culturally Relevant Coping for Physical and Mental Health among Black Americans. (2021) · cites this paper as Wilson, Thorpe, and LaVeist 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robinson, M. N., & Thomas Tobin, C. S. (2021) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/00221465211009142 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wilson, K. B., Thorpe, R. J., & LaVeist, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Kanetha B.
- Venue
- Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 96
- Pages
- 149-153
- ISSN
- 0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2589339314
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Center for Health Policy
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Keywords
- racial disparities, African Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, health status, health behavior, social class, income and health, health interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Ethnicity, Female, Health Services, Humans, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Health Behavior, Racial Groups, Health Status Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review