Cited by 59Health disparities and outcomesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Dollar for Dollar: Racial and ethnic inequalities in health and health-related outcomes among persons with very high income

Wilson, Kanetha B., Thorpe, Roland J., LaVeist, Thomas A.·2017·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Racial and ethnic disparities in health have been well-documented, and low SES is widely considered to be a driver of this relationship. However, the race-social class-health interrelationship is complex, as several studies have found race disparities between racial/ethnic minorities and whites at middle- income levels. Research on higher income persons is complicated by the lack of data for persons with incomes about $75,000. Most national datasets collect income data in categories with the highest income category being $75,000 and above. In our study, we examined racial/ethnic disparities in health status and behaviors among persons of very high income, reported income of $175,000 or above per year. Data are from the Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS). Our findings revealed health disparities in 10 of the 16 health-related outcomes selected. African Americans were most dissimilar to whites at this income and with disadvantages on 6 health outcomes relative to whites. While results also showed some disparities for Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans relative to whites, these groups were advantaged, relative to whites on several health outcomes. Our findings indicate that income does not fully explain racial/ethnic disparities in health. Most public interventions are targeted to low income persons. However, public health interventions should target minority individuals of very high income as well, especially African Americans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, K. B., Thorpe, R. J., & LaVeist, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Kanetha B.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
96
Pages
149-153
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2589339314
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Center for Health Policy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
racial disparities, African Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, health status, health behavior, social class, income and health, health interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Ethnicity, Female, Health Services, Humans, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Health Behavior, Racial Groups, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review