Cited by 76Child Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family ViolencePosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Gender differences in adverse childhood experiences, collective violence, and the risk for addictive behaviors among university students in Tunisia

El Mhamdi, Sana, Lemieux, Andrine, Bouanene, Ines, Ben Salah, Arwa, Nakajima, Motohiro, Ben Salem, Kamel, al'Absi, Mustafa·2017·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Adverse childhood experiences (ACE) have been linked to a variety of addictive behaviors. The recent adaptation of the ACE measure by the World Health Organization (WHO) allows for the assessment of the negative role of additional adverse experiences, such as extra-familial violence. To date, the relationship between extra-familial violence and addictive behaviors has not been assessed. We report the contribution of ACEs, including the new scales for extra-familial violence, on the risk for mental health problems and addictive behaviors by gender in a sample of young adults in Tunisia. We conducted a cross sectional study in Tunisia during 2014, where we recruited 1200 young university adults who completed the validated Arabic version of the WHO ACE questionnaire in a university setting. Results indicated that intra-familial adversities were associated with increased risk for addictive behaviors, particularly in males. ACEs were also associated with increased risk for mental health problems with women showing more difficulties than men. Exposure to peer, community and collective violence was higher in males than in females and logistic regression confirms that exposure to extra-familial violence increased the risk for addictive behaviors both in male and females by two to three-fold. Mental health problems were associated with peer violence and substance abuse in males, but not in females. Results demonstrate for the first time the contribution of exposure to extra-familial v…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 76

Authors
El Mhamdi, S., Lemieux, A., Bouanene, I., Ben Salah, A., Nakajima, M., Ben Salem, K., & al'Absi, M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
99
Pages
99-104
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2588460109
Cited by
76
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, gender differences, collective violence, addictive behavior, substance abuse, mental illness, peer violence, university students, Tunisia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Tunisia, Universities, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review