Cited by 70Women's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening – A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark

Harder, Elise, Juul, Kirsten E., Jensen, Signe M., Thomsen, Louise T., Frederiksen, Kirsten, Kjaer, Susanne K.·2018·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Cervical cancer occurs most often in under-screened women. In this nationwide register study, we described differences in sociodemographic characteristics between passive and active non-participants and examined socio-demographic characteristics, reproductive history, and mental and physical health as potential determinants for passive non-participation compared with participation in the Danish cervical cancer screening program. Screening history in women aged 23-49 years invited for cervical cancer screening in 2008-2009 was retrieved from the Danish Pathology Databank with information about dates of invitation and unsubscription. We identified participants (n = 402,984), active non-participants (n = 10,251) and passive non-participants (n = 63,435) within four years following baseline invitation and retrieved data about the study population from high-quality registries. We examined differences in socio-demographic characteristics of passive and active non-participants, and used multiple logistic regression analyses to identify potential determinants of passive non-participation. We found that active and passive non-participants differed in relation to socio-demography. When compared with screening participants, the odds of passive non-participation was increased in women who originated from less developed countries; were unmarried; had basic education or low income; had four or more children; smoked during pregnancy; had multiple induced abortions; or had a history of obesi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between country of birth/immigration status and lower screening attendance is likely due to language barriers and cultural beliefs.

    “Country of birth and immigration status have been associated with lower screening attendance in Denmark and the Netherlands (Kingdom of the) [7,18,33], likely due to language barriers and cultural beliefs [32].”
  • Even in well-organised, free-of-charge programmes, women with lower SES and/or mental health problems are less likely to be screened.

    “A Dutch study indicates that even in well-organised, free-of-charge programmes, women with lower SES and/ or mental health problems are less likely to be screened [32].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harder, E., Juul, K. E., Jensen, S. M., Thomsen, L. T., Frederiksen, K., & Kjaer, S. K.
Affiliations
Danish Cancer Society (DK)
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
111
Pages
94-100
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792839603
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Mermaid project (Mermaid II)
  • Danish Cancer Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, screening non-participation, sociodemographic factors, reproductive history, mental health, physical health, abortion, smoking during pregnancy, obesity, schizophrenia, low income
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Denmark, Female, Health Status, Humans, Mass Screening, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Registries, Socioeconomic Factors, Databases, Factual, Emigrants and Immigrants, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review