Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening – A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark
Abstract
Cervical cancer occurs most often in under-screened women. In this nationwide register study, we described differences in sociodemographic characteristics between passive and active non-participants and examined socio-demographic characteristics, reproductive history, and mental and physical health as potential determinants for passive non-participation compared with participation in the Danish cervical cancer screening program. Screening history in women aged 23-49 years invited for cervical cancer screening in 2008-2009 was retrieved from the Danish Pathology Databank with information about dates of invitation and unsubscription. We identified participants (n = 402,984), active non-participants (n = 10,251) and passive non-participants (n = 63,435) within four years following baseline invitation and retrieved data about the study population from high-quality registries. We examined differences in socio-demographic characteristics of passive and active non-participants, and used multiple logistic regression analyses to identify potential determinants of passive non-participation. We found that active and passive non-participants differed in relation to socio-demography. When compared with screening participants, the odds of passive non-participation was increased in women who originated from less developed countries; were unmarried; had basic education or low income; had four or more children; smoked during pregnancy; had multiple induced abortions; or had a history of obesi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The association between country of birth/immigration status and lower screening attendance is likely due to language barriers and cultural beliefs.
“Country of birth and immigration status have been associated with lower screening attendance in Denmark and the Netherlands (Kingdom of the) [7,18,33], likely due to language barriers and cultural beliefs [32].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
Even in well-organised, free-of-charge programmes, women with lower SES and/or mental health problems are less likely to be screened.
“A Dutch study indicates that even in well-organised, free-of-charge programmes, women with lower SES and/ or mental health problems are less likely to be screened [32].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vallone, F., Lemmo, D., Martino, M. L., Donizzetti, A. R., Freda, M. F., Palumbo, F., Lorenzo, E., D’Argenzio, A., & Caso, D. (2022) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5997 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Judah, G., Dilib, F., Darzi, A., & Huf, S. (2022) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-022-09529-w · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review
Palsola, M., Likki, T., Snijders, V., Corbex, M., Lasierra, L., & Curtis, B. (2026) · Glasnik javnog zdravlja · doi:10.5937/serbjph2601086p
- Authors
- Harder, E., Juul, K. E., Jensen, S. M., Thomsen, L. T., Frederiksen, K., & Kjaer, S. K.
- Affiliations
- Danish Cancer Society (DK)
- Venue
- Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 94-100
- ISSN
- 0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792839603
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mermaid project (Mermaid II)
- Danish Cancer Society
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- cervical cancer screening, screening non-participation, sociodemographic factors, reproductive history, mental health, physical health, abortion, smoking during pregnancy, obesity, schizophrenia, low income
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Denmark, Female, Health Status, Humans, Mass Screening, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Registries, Socioeconomic Factors, Databases, Factual, Emigrants and Immigrants, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review