Cited by 20Obesity, Physical Activity, DietChild Abuse and TraumaFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations

The impact of positive contextual factors on the association between adverse family experiences and obesity in a National Survey of Children

Lynch, Brian A., Finney Rutten, Lila J., Wilson, Patrick M., Kumar, Seema, Phelan, Sean, Jacobson, Robert M., Fan, Chun, Agunwamba, Amenah·2018·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Adverse family experiences (AFEs) are associated with childhood obesity. We evaluated whether certain positive contextual factors reduce the risk of obesity and overweight among children exposed to AFEs in a nationally representative sample. Using data derived from the National Survey of Children's Health 2011-12 (N = 43,864), we calculated the distribution of positive contextual factors (very good/excellent maternal mental health, neighborhood and school safety, and child resilience) and AFEs across weight status. The AFEs composite score was modeled as a categorical measure (0 or ≥1 AFEs). Positive contextual factors, AFEs and their interactions were evaluated in weighted, adjusted, multinomial logistic regression models predicting the odds of overweight and obesity. Children exposed to lack of very good/excellent maternal mental health and at least one AFE were at risk for overweight (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.16, 1.76) and obesity (OR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.22, 1.93). Unsafe school or neighborhood environment and exposure to 1 or more AFEs was. associated with overweight (OR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.61) and obesity (OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.34, 2.05). Lack of child resilience and exposure to 1 or more AFEs was associated with an increased risk of obesity (OR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.90) and overweight (OR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.57). These odds of obesity and overweight all decreased when positive contextual factors were present. Among children exposed to AFEs, overweight and obesity risk is reduced with positive contextual factors. Optimizing the early childhood environment can impact obesity risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.09.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 20

Authors
Lynch, B. A., Finney Rutten, L. J., Wilson, P. M., Kumar, S., Phelan, S., Jacobson, R. M., Fan, C., & Agunwamba, A.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Lynch, Brian A.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
116
Pages
81-86
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892349059
Cited by
20
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Keywords
childhood obesity, childhood overweight, maternal mental health, neighborhood safety, school safety, child resilience, early childhood environment, protective factors
MeSH terms
Adverse Childhood Experiences, Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Family, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Resilience, Psychological, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review