Cited by 158Smoking Behavior and CessationAir Quality and Health ImpactsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Burden of disease attributable to second-hand smoke exposure: A systematic review

Open access
Carreras, Giulia, Lugo, Alessandra, Gallus, Silvano, Cortini, Barbara, Fernández, Esteve, López, Maria José, Soriano, Joan B., López-Nicolás, Angel +46 more·2019·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Our aim was to provide a systematic review of studies on the burden of disease due to second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure, reviewing methods, exposure assessment, diseases causally linked to SHS, health outcomes, and estimates available to date. A literature review of studies on the burden of disease from SHS exposure, available in PubMed and SCOPUS, published 2007-2018 in English language, was carried out following the PRISMA recommendations. Overall, 588 studies were first identified, and 94 were eligible. Seventy-two studies were included in the systematic review. Most of them were based on the comparative risk assessment approach, assessing SHS exposure using mainly surveys on exposure at home/workplaces. Diseases more frequently studied were: lung cancer, ischemic heart disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and breast cancer in adults; lower respiratory tract infection, otitis media, asthma, sudden infant death syndrome and low birth weight in children. The SHS exposure assessment and the reported population attributable fractions (PAF) were largely heterogeneous. As an example, the PAF from lung cancer varied between 0.6% and 20.5%. Moreover, PAF were estimated applying relative risks and SHS exposures with no consistent definitions or with different age classes. The research gap on the SHS exposure burden is shrinking. However, estimates are not yet available for a number of countries, particularly the Middle Eastern and African countries, and not…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105833

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research, including meta-analyses, found suggestive evidence of an association between SHS exposure and breast cancer.

    “Additionally, previous research, including meta-analyses, found suggestive evidence of an association between SHS exposure and breast cancer13–15.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carreras, G., Lugo, A., Gallus, S., Cortini, B., Fernández, E., López, M. J., Soriano, J. B., López-Nicolás, A., Semple, S., Gorini, G., Castellano, Y., Fu, M., Ballbè, M., Amalia, B., Tigova, O., Continente, X., Arechavala, T., Henderson, E., Lugo, A., Liu, X., Bosetti, C., Davoli, E., Colombo, P., O'Donnell, R., Dobson, R., Clancy, L., Keogan, S., Byrne, H., Behrakis, P., Tzortzi, A., Vardavas, C., Vyzikidou, V. K., Bakellas, G., Mattiampa, G., Boffi, R., Ruprecht, A., De Marco, C., Borgini, A., Veronese, C., Bertoldi, M., Tittarelli, A., Verdi, S., Chellini, E., Trapero-Bertran, M., Guerrero, D. C., Radu-Loghin, C., Nguyen, D., Starchenko, P., Ancochea, J., Alonso, T., Pastor, M. T., Erro, M., Roca, A., & Pérez, P.
Affiliations
  • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT)
  • Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • Agencia de Salud Pública de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Carreras, Giulia
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
129
Pages
105833
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971669942
Cited by
158
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Generalitat de Catalunya
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  • Horizon 2020
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
passive smoking, disease burden, population attributable fraction, comparative risk assessment, lung cancer, ischemic heart disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, breast cancer, sudden infant death syndrome, low birth weight, otitis media, lower respiratory tract infection, exposure assessment
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Cost of Illness, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review