The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive Surgical Margin and Perioperative Complication Rates of Primary Surgical Treatments for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Prostatectomy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Dindo, D., Demartines, N., & Clavien, P.-A. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae · Cited by 31,378
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J., & Ward, E. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20073 · Cited by 12,596
Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078 · Cited by 3,082
Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA Guideline
Carter, H. B., Albertsen, P. C., Barry, M. J., Etzioni, R., Freedland, S. J., Greene, K. L., Holmberg, L., Kantoff, P., Konety, B. R., Murad, M. H., et al. (2013) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119 · Cited by 1,242
Ficarra, V., Novara, G., Artibani, W., Cestari, A., Galfano, A., Graefen, M., Guazzoni, G., Guillonneau, B., Menon, M., Montorsi, F., et al. (2009) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036 · Cited by 1,035
Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy
Hu, J. C. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1451 · Cited by 816
AHLERING, T. E., SKARECKY, D., LEE, D., & CLAYMAN, R. V. (2003) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000092881.24608.5e · Cited by 652
Cited by
Novara, G., Ficarra, V., Mocellin, S., Ahlering, T. E., Carroll, P. R., Graefen, M., Guazzoni, G., Menon, M., Patel, V. R., Shariat, S. F., et al. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047 · Cited by 527
Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Contemporary Update
Yossepowitch, O., Briganti, A., Eastham, J. A., Epstein, J., Graefen, M., Montironi, R., & Touijer, K. (2014) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.039 · Cited by 423
Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses in urological literature
Xia, L., Xu, J., & Guzzo, T. J. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.3129 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Andriole, G. L.
- Venue
- Yearbook of Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 2012
- Pages
- 68-69
- ISSN
- 0084-4071 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321200854
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positive Surgical Margin and Perioperative Complication Rates of Primary Surgical Treatments for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Prostatectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.yuro.2012.07.016
- The paper
- Andriole, G. L. (2012). Positive Surgical Margin and Perioperative Complication Rates of Primary Surgical Treatments for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Prostatectomy. Yearbook of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yuro.2012.07.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
