Qualitätsindikatoren zur Bewertung von Medikationsanalysen in öffentlichen Apotheken
Abstract
Background Medication reviews conducted in community pharmacies are a measure to reduce drug-related problems and to increase medication safety. Since 2014, a guideline for medication reviews has been available in Germany. However, the sole existence of a guideline does not guarantee a high quality of this novel service. Quality indicators can contribute to ensure appropriate quality standards. So far, no such indicators have been available in Germany. This project therefore aims at developing suitable indicators to assess the quality of medication reviews type 2a in community pharmacies. Methods Based on a literature review, potential quality indicators were generated. Using a two-step Delphi method applying the RUMBA criteria, a set of structure, process, and outcome indicators was developed. Results The literature review identified 23 potential indicators. Nine further indicators derived from the guideline for medication reviews and expert opinion were amended. After discussion in a focus group, the 32 indicators were reduced to a preliminary set of twelve indicators used for the Delphi survey. Following two Delphi rounds, a final indicator set consisting of three structure indicators, one process indicator and two outcome indicators, was generated. Discussion The set of quality indicators is potentially suitable for measuring the quality of medication reviews in German community pharmacies. In the next step, these indicators need to be evaluated with regard to their validity and applicability in daily routine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Structural indicators express the impact of the environment on nursing, including material resources, human resources and organizational structure.
“Structural indicators express the impact of the environment on nursing, including material resources, human resources and organizational structure (Waltering et al., 2020).”
From Construction of haemodialysis nursing‐sensitive quality indicators based on Donabedian theory: A Delphi method study (2023) · cites this paper as Waltering et al., 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Li, Q., & He, L. (2023) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.1349 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Structural indicators express the impact of the environment on nursing, including material resources, human resources and organizational structure (Waltering et al., 2020).”
Background
- Authors
- Waltering, I., Scheppe, S., Kurth, V., Hempel, G., & Jaehde, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Münster (DE)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Waltering, Isabel
- Venue
- Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 153-154
- Pages
- 44-53
- ISSN
- 1865-9217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3032269283
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- quality indicators, medication review, community pharmacy, public pharmacies, drug-related problems, drug safety, quality assessment
- MeSH terms
- Germany, Pharmacies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Quality Indicators, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
