CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 173Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsFolate and B Vitamins Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The nested case-control study in cardiology

Essebag, Vidal, Genest, Jacques, Suissa, Samy, Pilote, Louise·2003·American Heart Journal
DOI 10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00512-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background The nested case-control study is an efficient epidemiological design whereby a case-control approach is employed within an established cohort. The large number of recent prospective studies and randomized trials conducted in cardiology provide cohorts within which the nested case-control approach is increasingly used. Methods This paper describes the design of the nested case-control study, and evaluates its role in cardiology by reviewing all such studies indexed in Medline from 1966 to 2000. The example of homocysteine is used to illustrate how discrepancies between results of nested case-control and case-control studies played an important role in the decisions and recommendations of national and international organizations. Results Seventy-seven nested case-control studies in cardiology were reviewed. The number of studies per year has been increasing since the first publication in 1987. The majority (96%) of studies evaluated potential risk factors for cardiovascular disease while the remainder evaluated drugs with cardiac adverse effects. In studies of homocysteine and coronary artery disease, nested case-control studies did not confirm the strong association suggested by early case-control studies that may have been influenced by bias (eg, selection, publication, or reverse causality). This led national and international organizations to advise against routine screening. Conclusions The nested case-control study is increasingly used to study causal relationships in cardiology. The large cohorts of cardiac patients created by prospective studies, clinical trials, and administrative databases should be exploited using this methodology to assess potential cardiac risk factors and other causal relationships that cannot be studied in randomized trials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00512-x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 1998, Coronary artery disease, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 8, 229
  2. Booth, 2000, Preventive health care, 2000 update, CMAJ, 163, 21
  3. Genest, 2000, Homocysteine, CMAJ, 163, 37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 173

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Essebag, V., Genest, J., Suissa, S., & Pilote, L.
Affiliations
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Pilote, Louise
ORCID
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
146
Issue
4
Pages
581-590
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00512-x
OpenAlex
W2029994787
Cited by
173
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Folate and B Vitamins Research
Keywords
nested case-control study, homocysteine, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk factors, selection bias, publication bias, reverse causality, causal inference
MeSH terms
Cardiology, Coronary Disease, Homocysteine, Humans, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review