Cited by 55Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Temporal patterns of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation following DDDR pacemaker implantation

Gillis, Anne M., Rose, M.Sarah·2000·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes have been reported to be randomly distributed. However, because patients are not always symptomatic, it has been difficult to study temporal patterns of AF. Newer implantable pulse generators have data-logging capabilities that permit the detection and analysis of temporal patterns of AF. This study tested the hypothesis that AF episodes occur in clusters over time and that these episodes are not randomly distributed in individual patients. The date and time of 582 episodes of AF were recorded from the data logs of 16 patients with a Medtronic Thera DR followed 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months after pulse generator implant. The probability of AF recurrence and the interevent intervals between successive episodes of AF were fitted to monoexponential and Weibull distributions. A Weibull distribution best described the nonrandom distribution of AF for 67% of follow-up visits. Temporal clustering of AF (interevent intervals <24 hours) declined during follow-up (95 +/- 10%, 90 +/- 11%, and 74 +/- 28% at the 6-week and 6- and 12-month visits, respectively; p <0.05). The average duration of an episode of AF tended to increase over time (0.31 hour, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.17 to 0.58 hours; 0.36 hours, 95% CI 0. 17 to 0.78 hours; 0.65 hours, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.45 hours [p = 0.07] at the 6-week and 6- and 12-month visits, respectively). Paroxysmal AF recurrence is nonrandomly distributed over the long term in many patients. The temporal patterns of AF change over time after pacemaker implantation. This has implications for the selection of study end points in AF clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00792-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 55

Authors
Gillis, A. M., & Rose, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Gillis, Anne M.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
85
Issue
12
Pages
1445-1450
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067102234
Cited by
55
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, DDDR pacemaker, atrial fibrillation recurrence, temporal clustering, inter-event time, Weibull distribution
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Pacemaker, Artificial, Recurrence, Sensitivity and Specificity, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review