Cited by 297Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Decreased heart rate variability in men with phobic anxiety (data from the normative aging study)

Open access
Kawachi, Ichiro, Sparrow, David, Vokonas, Pantel S., Weiss, Scott T.·1995·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Prospective cohort studies suggest that phobic anxiety is a strong risk factor for fatal coronary artery disease, in particular, sudden cardiac death. It has also been established that reduced heart rate (HR) variability can identify patients at high risk for subsequent sudden cardiac death. We therefore hypothesized that persons with symptoms of phobic anxiety may exhibit reduced HR variability. We tested our hypothesis in 581 men, aged 47 to 86 years, enrolled in the Normative Aging Study who were free of coronary artery disease and diabetes. Symptoms of anxiety were assessed using the Crown-Crisp index, an instrument that has been demonstrated in previous prospective studies to strongly predict risk of sudden cardiac death. HR variability was measured under standardized conditions, with paced deep breathing (6 breaths/1 min). Two measures of HR variability were used: the SD of HR and the maximal minus minimal HR over 1 minute. Men reporting higher levels of phobic anxiety had a higher resting HR (p = 0.025 for linear trend). After adjusting for age, mean HR, and body mass index in analyses of covariance, men reporting higher levels of phobic anxiety had lower HR variability, whether measured by the SD of HR (p = 0.03 for linear trend). These data suggest that phobic anxiety is associated with altered cardiac autonomic control, and hence increased risk of sudden cardiac death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80680-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 32 · Cited by 297

Authors
Kawachi, I., Sparrow, D., Vokonas, P. S., & Weiss, S. T.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Kawachi, Ichiro
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-05
Volume
75
Issue
14
Pages
882-885
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992215418
Cited by
297
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl045089-03)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL45089)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
phobic anxiety, heart rate variability, sudden cardiac death, cardiac autonomic control, coronary artery disease risk, resting heart rate, men, aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Heart Rate, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Risk Factors, Death, Sudden, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review