The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prospective evaluation of unexplained chronic liver transaminase abnormalities in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: It is currently recommend to perform a liver biopsy for patients with chronically elevated liver function tests (LFT) of unknown etiology (marker negative). The necessity and benefits of these recommendations are unknown. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of marker-negative LFT in patients referred for evaluation of chronically elevated LFT; to determine the prevalence of diseases that may be associated with marker-negative abnormal LFT; and to assess whether a liver biopsy alters the management of such patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of 1124 adults referred for evaluation of chronically elevated LFT. Patients who consented to a liver biopsy were eligible. Marker-negative abnormal LFT was defined as the absence of accepted serum markers for infectious, metabolic, autoimmune, or hereditary liver disease, the absence of a history of alcohol or hepatotoxic drug use, and the absence of signs of chronic liver disease. RESULTS: Eighty-one of 1124 eligible patients were marker-negative. Liver biopsies in the 81 marker-negative patients revealed: normal histology (eight), steatosis (41), steatohepatitis (26), fibrosis (four), and cirrhosis (two). All 73 abnormal liver biopsies had some degree of steatosis. There were no significant associations between histological findings and the presence of obesity (p = 0.13), hyperlipidemia (p = 0.4), or diabetes (p = 0.9). There were no significant associations when classifying patients by gender or by symptoms. CONCLUSION: In the setting of marker-negative elevated LFT, the most likely histological diagnosis is fatty metamorphosis of the liver with occasional associated fibrosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Powell, E. E., Cooksley, G. W. E., Hanson, R., Searle, J., Halliday, J. W., & Powell, L. W. (1990) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840110114 · Cited by 1,473
Cited by
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Angulo, P. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra011775 · Cited by 5,228
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Adams, L. A. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.045232 · Cited by 1,610
Updated definitions of healthy ranges for serum alanine aminotransferase levels
Prati, D., Taioli, E., Zanella, A., Torre, E. D., Butelli, S., Del Vecchio, E., Vianello, L., Zanuso, F., Mozzi, F., Milani, S., et al. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-1-200207020-00006 · Cited by 1,445
The prevalence and etiology of elevated aminotransferase levels in the United States
Clark, J. (2003) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9270(03)00265-x · Cited by 1,360
Evaluation of Abnormal Liver-Enzyme Results in Asymptomatic Patients
Pratt, D. S., & Kaplan, M. M. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200004273421707 · Cited by 1,203
Metadata
- Authors
- Daniel, S.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3010-3014
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057783249
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective evaluation of unexplained chronic liver transaminase abnormalities in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9270(99)00507-9
- The paper
- Daniel, S. (1999). Prospective evaluation of unexplained chronic liver transaminase abnormalities in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9270(99)00507-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.