Effects of nosocomial candidemia on outcomes of critically ill patients
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether nosocomial candidemia is associated with increased mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Subjects and methods We performed a retrospective (1992 to 2000) cohort study of 73 ICU patients with candidemia and 146 matched controls. Controls were matched based on disease severity as measured by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (+/- 1 point), diagnostic category, and length of ICU stay before onset of candidemia.Results In comparison with the control group, patients with candidemia developed more acute respiratory failure (97% [n = 71] vs. 88% [n = 129], P = 0.03) during their ICU stay. They were mechanically ventilated for a longer period (29 +/- 26 days vs. 19 +/- 19 days, P<0.01) and had a longer stay in the ICU (36 +/- 33 days vs. 25 +/- 23 days, P = 0.02) as well as in the hospital (77 +/- 81 days vs. 64 +/- 69 days, P = 0.04). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the groups (48% [n = 35] vs. 43% [n = 62], P = 0.44), a difference of 5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -8% to 19%). In a multivariate analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13 per 10 years; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.23; P = 0.004), acute renal failure (HR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.0; P = 0.02), and unfavorable APACHE II scores (HR = 1.10 per 5 points; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.20; P = 0.05) were independent predictors of mortality. Candidemia was not associated with mortality in a model that adjusted for these factors (HR = 0.9; 95% CI: 0.7 to 1.2; P = 0.53).Conclusion Nosocomial candidemia does not adversely affect the outcome in ICU patients in whom mortality is attributable to age, the severity of underlying disease, and acute illness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients with invasive candidiasis, mortality was 78% when therapy was delayed more than 48 hours from onset of candidemia, compared with 44% in those who received adequate initial therapy.
“Blot and colleagues 42 reported 78% mortality in patients with IC when therapy was delayed more than 48 hours from onset of candidemia; in contrast the mortality was 44% in those who had adequate initial therapy.”
From Fungal Sepsis: Optimizing Antifungal Therapy in the Critical Care Setting (2011) · cites this paper as [42]
All of these triazole agents have the same mechanism of action against Candida and, in many instances, are affected by the same resistance mechanisms.
“All of these agents have the same mechanism of action against Candida and, in many instances, are affected by the same resistance mechanisms (24, 32, 81, 225, 226, 260, 274, 294, 312).”
From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem (2007) · cites this paper as [24]
Cross-resistance between fluconazole and the extended-spectrum triazoles (voriconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole) is well described among isolates of C. glabrata.
“Cross-resistance between fluconazole and the extendedspectrum triazoles (voriconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole) is well described among isolates of C. glabrata”
From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem (2007) · cites this paper as [24]
Cross-resistance in C. glabrata is associated with increased expression of the genes Cg CDR1 and Cg CDR2 encoding the CDR efflux pumps.
“and is associated with increased expression of the genes (Cg CDR1 and Cg CDR2 ) encoding the CDR efflux pumps (24, 211, 216, 217, 218, 221, 225, 226, 260).”
From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem (2007) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 235
- Authors
- Blot, S. I., Vandewoude, K. H., Hoste, E. A., & Colardyn, F. A.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University Hospital (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Blot, Stijn I
- Venue
- The American Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 480-485
- ISSN
- 0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064476714
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- nosocomial candidemia, critically ill patients, ICU mortality, acute respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, APACHE II score, acute kidney injury, age as mortality predictor, invasive fungal infections, old age, mechanical ventilation duration, length of hospital stay, mortality risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Candidiasis, Cross Infection, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Survival Rate, Multivariate Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Fungemia, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, APACHE
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review