The occurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis in non-insulin-dependent diabetes and newly diagnosed diabetic adults
Abstract
Purpose To examine the occurrence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in adults without a prior history of type I diabetes.Patients and methods A retrospective review was conducted of medical records of adults presenting with DKA between 1987 and 1993. The medical record was reviewed to classify patients as type I, type II, or newly diagnosed diabetics and to determine the status of diabetic treatment following the episode of DKA in those patients without prior history of type I diabetes.Results Two hundred twenty-six patients were included in the study; 106 (47%) were classified as type I and 58 (26%) as type II from data available in the medical record, and 62 (27%) had DKA as the initial manifestation of the disease. Nineteen percent of the patients in whom diabetes was a new diagnosis and 52% of the patients who had a prior history of NIDDM were > or = 40 years old. Of patients with follow-up of at least 12 months, about 24% of the newly diagnosed and 8% of those with a history of NIDDM were not taking insulin.Conclusion DKA occurs in patients with type II diabetes. Older patients may present with clinically apparent type I diabetes. Some adults who present with DKA do not remain insulin dependent.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of older adults with low BMI will have type 2 diabetes.
“The majority of older adults with low BMI will have type 2 diabetes (9,12,13), even more so when a person's ethnicity is associated with high type 2 diabetes risk (14).”
Diabetic ketoacidosis is most commonly associated with type 1 diabetes but may occur rarely in type 2 diabetes.
“Although DKA is most commonly associated with type 1 diabetes, it may occur rarely in type 2 diabetic patients (193).”
From Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus (2011) · cites this paper as [193]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Westphal, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Maricopa Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Westphal, Sydney A.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-24
- ISSN
- 0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059790025
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- diabetic ketoacidosis, type 2 diabetes, type 1 diabetes, newly diagnosed diabetes, adults, insulin dependence, diabetes treatment, age of onset, misdiagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Incidence, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Age Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review