Cited by 239Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and Trauma

Physical injury after sexual assault: Findings of a large case series

Sugar, N.F, Fine, D.N, Eckert, L.O·2004·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective This study was undertaken to determine characteristics associated with physical injury in female sexual assault victims. Study design All females who were 15 years or older presenting after sexual assault to an urban emergency department during a 34-month period underwent standardized evaluation. Analysis was performed by chi(2) and logistic regression. Results Of 819 women, 52% had general body and 20% had genital-anal trauma; 41% were without injury. General body trauma was independently associated with being hit or kicked (odds ratio [OR]=7.7, 95% CI, 5.1-11.7), attempted strangulation (OR=4.2, 95% CI, 2.5-7.2), oral or anal penetration (OR=1.7, 95% CI, 1.2-2.3), and stranger (OR=2.4, 95% CI, 1.7-3.4) assault. Genital-anal injury was more frequent in victims younger than 20 and older than 49 years (P<.05), in virgins (OR=2.7, 95% CI, 1.4-5.4) and those examined within 24 hours (OR=1.7, 95% CI, 1.2-2.4) and after anal assault (OR=1.7, 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). Conclusion General body injury is primarily associated with situational factors, whereas genital-anal injury is less frequent and related to victim age, virginal status, and time to examination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00912-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Victims do not necessarily sustain physical injuries from their ordeal.

    “There are numerous reasons why rape victims might not physically resist their attackers (Lees 1996), and victims do not necessarily sustain physical injuries from their ordeal (Sugar et al. 2004).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sugar, N. F., Fine, D. N., & Eckert, L. O.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
190
Issue
1
Pages
71-76
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968008139
Cited by
239
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
19.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
sexual assault, personal injury, women victims, anal penetration, victim age, emergency department evaluation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anal Canal, Female, Genitalia, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk, Sex Offenses, Violence, Washington, Wounds and Injuries, Odds Ratio, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review