Physical injury after sexual assault: Findings of a large case series
Abstract
Objective This study was undertaken to determine characteristics associated with physical injury in female sexual assault victims. Study design All females who were 15 years or older presenting after sexual assault to an urban emergency department during a 34-month period underwent standardized evaluation. Analysis was performed by chi(2) and logistic regression. Results Of 819 women, 52% had general body and 20% had genital-anal trauma; 41% were without injury. General body trauma was independently associated with being hit or kicked (odds ratio [OR]=7.7, 95% CI, 5.1-11.7), attempted strangulation (OR=4.2, 95% CI, 2.5-7.2), oral or anal penetration (OR=1.7, 95% CI, 1.2-2.3), and stranger (OR=2.4, 95% CI, 1.7-3.4) assault. Genital-anal injury was more frequent in victims younger than 20 and older than 49 years (P<.05), in virgins (OR=2.7, 95% CI, 1.4-5.4) and those examined within 24 hours (OR=1.7, 95% CI, 1.2-2.4) and after anal assault (OR=1.7, 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). Conclusion General body injury is primarily associated with situational factors, whereas genital-anal injury is less frequent and related to victim age, virginal status, and time to examination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Victims do not necessarily sustain physical injuries from their ordeal.
“There are numerous reasons why rape victims might not physically resist their attackers (Lees 1996), and victims do not necessarily sustain physical injuries from their ordeal (Sugar et al. 2004).”
From Lawyers' Strategies for Cross-Examining Rape Complainants: Have we Moved Beyond the 1950s? (2016) · cites this paper as Sugar et al. 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lawyers' Strategies for Cross-Examining Rape Complainants: Have we Moved Beyond the 1950s?
Zydervelt, S., Zajac, R., Kaladelfos, A., & Westera, N. (2016) · British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azw023 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Evaluation and management of female victims of sexual assault.
Vrees, R. A. (2017) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/ogx.0000000000000390 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Campbell, R., Javorka, M., Engleton, J., Goodman-Williams, R., & Gregory, K. (2023) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605221098963 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…scared to go to hospital emergency departments during the pandemic, which raises questions about the necessity of conducting MFEs/SAKs in hospital settings given that most sexual assault victims do not sustain injuries that need trauma intervention (Sugar et al., 2004; Zilkens et al., 2017, 2018).”
Background
- Authors
- Sugar, N. F., Fine, D. N., & Eckert, L. O.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- ORCID
- Eckert, L.O
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-76
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968008139
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 19.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- sexual assault, personal injury, women victims, anal penetration, victim age, emergency department evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anal Canal, Female, Genitalia, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk, Sex Offenses, Violence, Washington, Wounds and Injuries, Odds Ratio, Age Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review