Cited by 119Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesNeurological Complications and SyndromesPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A randomized prospective comparison of nifedipine and bedrest versus bed rest alone in the management of preeclampsia remote from term

Sibai, Baha M., Barton, John R., Sherif, Akl, Sarinoglu, Cem, Mercer, Brian M.·1992·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The objective of our study was to test the hypothesis that treatment with nifedipine for mild preeclampsia remote from term reduces the number of days of maternal hospitalization and improves pregnancy outcome.Study design A total of 200 patients at 26 to 36 weeks' gestation were randomly allocated to treatment with either bed rest alone (n = 100) or bed rest in combination with nifedipine (n = 100).Results Patients receiving nifedipine had significantly lower systolic (p < 0.0001) and diastolic (p < 0.0001) blood pressures during therapy. Severe hypertension as an indication for delivery was significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent in the bed-rest-alone group. The two study groups had similar average days of maternal hospitalization (12.6 +/- 7.9 vs 12.3 +/- 10.3) and pregnancy prolongation (22.3 +/- 13.5 vs 22.5 +/- 15.7). There were no differences between groups with respect to birth weight, incidences of small-for-gestational-age infants and preterm birth, number of days spent in special care unit, or cord blood gas measurement.Conclusion Nifedipine therapy for preeclampsia reduces maternal blood pressure but does not reduce number of days of maternal hospitalization or improve perinatal outcome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)80005-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The only RCTs that evaluated activity restriction in preeclampsia compared bed rest with immediate delivery, a design that precludes independent analysis of activity restriction as an intervention.

    “However, the only RCTs that have evaluated activity restriction in the setting of preeclampsia compared bed rest with immediate delivery—a study design that precludes independent analysis of activity restriction as an intervention.23,24”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 119

Metadata

Authors
Sibai, B. M., Barton, J. R., Sherif, A., Sarinoglu, C., & Mercer, B. M.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Sibai, Baha M.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-10
Volume
167
Issue
4
Pages
879-884
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014602673
Cited by
119
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Keywords
nifedipine, preeclampsia, bed rest, antihypertensive therapy, maternal blood pressure, maternal hospitalization, pregnancy outcomes, preterm birth, small for gestational age, perinatal outcomes
MeSH terms
Bed Rest, Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Nifedipine, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review