Cited by 32Ovarian function and disordersPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Influence of the menstrual cycle on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion

Bonora, Enzo, Zavaroni, Ivana, Alpi, Orsola, Pezzarossa, Antonio, Dall'Aglio, Elisabetta, Coscelli, Carlo, Butturini, Ugo·1987·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of the menstrual cycle on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion, in the present study we have measured the plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide during a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test in 110 healthy, nonobese, regularly menstruating women. Fifty-five women were in the follicular phase, and 55 were in the luteal phase of the cycle. The two groups were well matched for age and body weight. Plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide either in the fasting state or after the oral glucose load did not differ in the two groups. These results suggest that in nondiabetic women the menstrual cycle has no major effect on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion and that the phase of the menstrual cycle should not be considered in programming and interpreting an oral glucose tolerance test.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80365-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has used various techniques to assess insulin sensitivity during the menstrual cycle, but most studies were performed in nondiabetic women and obtained different results with hyperglycaemic versus euglycaemic techniques.

    “Previous research has indeed used various techniques to assess IS during the MC such as the glucose tolerance test and the euglycaemic or hyperglycaemic clamp [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], but most of the studies have been performed in nondiabetic women and have obtained different results with the hyperglycemic versus the euglycemic technique.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonora, E., Zavaroni, I., Alpi, O., Pezzarossa, A., Dall'Aglio, E., Coscelli, C., & Butturini, U.
Affiliations
University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Bonora, Enzo
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-07
Volume
157
Issue
1
Pages
140-141
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013020836
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
menstrual cycle, glucose tolerance, insulin secretion, C-peptide, oral glucose tolerance test, follicular phase, luteal phase, women, non-diabetic women
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Adult, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Menstrual Cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review