Cited by 400Reproductive Health and ContraceptionReproductive System and PregnancyInternational Human Rights and Reproductive Law

The mechanism of action of hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices

Rivera, Roberto, Yacobson, Irene, Grimes, David·1999·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Modern hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices have multiple biologic effects. Some of them may be the primary mechanism of contraceptive action, whereas others are secondary. For combined oral contraceptives and progestin-only methods, the main mechanisms are ovulation inhibition and changes in the cervical mucus that inhibit sperm penetration. The hormonal methods, particularly the low-dose progestin-only products and emergency contraceptive pills, have effects on the endometrium that, theoretically, could affect implantation. However, no scientific evidence indicates that prevention of implantation actually results from the use of these methods. Once pregnancy begins, none of these methods has an abortifacient action. The precise mechanism of intrauterine contraceptive devices is unclear. Current evidence indicates they exert their primary effect before fertilization, reducing the opportunity of sperm to fertilize an ovum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70120-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only orally administered steroids undergo hepatic first-pass metabolism; thus the localized progestin of the IUD exerts different metabolic effects compared to the progestin of the COC with no changes in body composition or body mass.

    “Importantly, only orally administered steroids undergo hepatic first-pass metabolism; thus, the localized progestin of the IUD exerts different metabolic effects as compared to the progestin of the COC with no changes in body composition or body mass [103].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 400

Authors
Rivera, R., Yacobson, I., & Grimes, D.
Affiliations
Family Health International 360 (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-11
Volume
181
Issue
5
Pages
1263-1269
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059117740
Cited by
400
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 28
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Keywords
hormonal contraception, intrauterine devices, mechanism of action, ovulation inhibition, cervical mucus, sperm penetration, endometrium, implantation, emergency contraceptive pills, progestin-only contraception, combined oral contraceptives, abortifacient effect
MeSH terms
Abortifacient Agents, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Contraceptives, Postcoital, Female, Humans, Intrauterine Devices, Male, Mucus, Ovary, Spermatozoa, Uterus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review