Vision and quality-of-life. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1999;97:473–511.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
African-American patients with diabetes are less likely to undergo annual screening exams for DR.
“African-American patients with diabetes are less likely to undergo annual screening exams for DR4–7.”
From Autonomous AI-assisted diabetic retinopathy screening at primary care is associated with increased presentation to eye care by at risk patients (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leong, A., Wolf, R. M., Channa, R., Wang, J., Lehmann, H., Abramoff, M. D., & Liu, T. Y. A. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02460-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brown, G. C.
- Corresponding author
- Brown, G.C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 833
- ISSN
- 0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032968594
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Keywords
- visual acuity loss, quality of life, visual impairment, time trade-off, standard gamble, utility value, best-corrected visual acuity, visual function, cost-effectiveness analysis, patient preferences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
