Subcellular Topography of Neuronal Aβ Peptide in APPxPS1 Transgenic Mice
Open accessAbstract
In transgenic mice expressing human mutant beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP) and mutant presenilin-1 (PS1), Abeta antibodies labeled granules, about 1 microm in diameter, in the perikaryon of neurons clustered in the isocortex, hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, and brainstem. The granules were present before the onset of Abeta deposits; their number increased up to 9 months and decreased in 15-month-old animals. They were immunostained by antibodies against Abeta 40, Abeta 42, and APP C-terminal region. In double immunofluorescence experiments, the intracellular Abeta co-localized with lysosome markers and less frequently with MG160, a Golgi marker. Abeta accumulation correlated with an increased volume of lysosomes and Golgi apparatus, while the volume of endoplasmic reticulum and early endosomes did not change. Some granules were immunolabeled with an antibody against flotillin-1, a raft marker. At electron microscopy, Abeta, APP-C terminal, cathepsin D, and flotillin-1 epitopes were found in the lumen of multivesicular bodies. This study shows that Abeta peptide and APP C-terminal region accumulate in multivesicular bodies containing lysosomal enzymes, while APP N-terminus is excluded from them. Multivesicular bodies could secondarily liberate their content in the extracellular space as suggested by the association of cathepsin D with Abeta peptide in the extracellular space.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is an apparent decline in intraneuronal Aβ42 labeling with advancing plaque pathology.
“this and subsequent studies noted an apparent decline in intraneuronal Aβ42 labeling with advancing plaque pathology [95, 139].”
From Intraneuronal β-amyloid accumulation and synapse pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (2010) · cites this paper as [95]
Endosomal Aβ42 labeling by immuno-EM has been confirmed by other groups.
“Endosomal Aβ42 labeling by immuno-EM has since been confirmed by other groups [49, 95, 143].”
From Intraneuronal β-amyloid accumulation and synapse pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (2010) · cites this paper as [95]
Immuno-EM images of Aβ42-accumulating dystrophic neurites lacking normal microtubule tracks argue against active secretion of aggregating Aβ42 from neurites prior to plasma membrane dissolution.
“Immuno-EM images of completely abnormal Aβ42 accumulating dystrophic neurites [187, 188], lacking the normal microtubule tracks required for organelle trafficking, secretion and exocytosis, argue against the active secretion of aggregating Aβ42 from neuritis prior to the dissolution of the plasma membrane [95].”
From Intraneuronal β-amyloid accumulation and synapse pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (2010) · cites this paper as [95]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 165
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Mori C, Spooner ET, Wisniewski KE, Wisniewski TM, Yamaguchi H, Saido TC, Tolan DR, Selkoe DJ, Lemere CA: Intraneuronal Abeta42 accumulation in Down syndrome brain. Amyloid 2002, 9:88 -102
- De Gassart A, Geminard C, Fevrier B, Raposo G, Vidal M: Lipid raft-associated proteins are sorted in exosomes. Blood 2003, 102: 4336 -4344
- Authors
- Langui, D., Girardot, N., El Hachimi, K. H., Allinquant, B., Blanchard, V., Pradier, L., & Duyckaerts, C.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Duyckaerts, Charles
- Venue
- The American Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1465-1477
- ISSN
- 0002-9440 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1618656
- OpenAlex
- W1975903250
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal Of Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Association France Alzheimer
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- amyloid-beta, multivesicular bodies, lysosomes, Golgi apparatus, APP C-terminal fragments, cathepsin D, flotillin-1, presenilin 1, amyloid precursor protein, Alzheimer's disease
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Epitopes, Brain, Cathepsin D, Genotype, Golgi Apparatus, Immunohistochemistry, Lysosomes, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Microscopy, Electron, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Biological, Neurons, Peptides, Blotting, Western, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Microscopy, Immunoelectron, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Biotinylation, Mice, Presenilin-1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review