Cited by 40Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsAdrenal Hormones and DisordersNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances

Feminizing adreno-cortical carcinomas in male adults. A dire prognosis

Moreno, S., Guillermo, M., Decoulx, M., Dewailly, D., Bresson, R., Proye, Ch.·2006·Annales d Endocrinologie

Abstract

Unlabelled We describe the clinical presentation, biochemical features, diagnostic criteria, clinical course and differential diagnosis in three cases of feminizing adreno-cortical carcinoma (FACC) with a review of the literature.Patients From 1970 throughout December 2003 among a series of 801 adrenalectomies, three had been performed for FACC.Results Age at presentation was 74, 63 and 23 years. Estradiol hypersecretion was observed in 3/3 patients, 17 OH progesterone was elevated in 2/3 patients and both of them had a diminution of testosterone, delta 4 androstenedione was elevated in 1/3 patients. Imaging studies suggested malignancy in 3/3 patients by the presence of necrosis, heterogeneity, calcifications, size of the tumor and compression of adjacent organs. All patients were stage III at presentation and had a Weiss score >or=6. Size and weight of the tumors were 30, 20, 15cm and 3750, 480 and 275g respectively. All 3 patients received mitotane and cortisone post-operatively and at follow up (7, 3 and 2 years) all 3 died of the disease.Conclusions Feminizing adreno-cortical carcinomas in adults are exceedingly rare (1-2% of adreno-cortical carcinomas). Tumors are huge and even after surgery for cure their prognosis is worse than for other varieties of adreno-cortical carcinomas either secreting or non secreting. Early diagnosis and treatment may improve overall prognosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-4266(06)72537-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elevated sex steroids are highly suspicious for ACC and urgent diagnostic evaluation is required.

    “Although benign cortisol-secreting adenomas may very rarely produce androgens (286), elevated sex steroids are highly suspicious for ACC and urgent diagnostic evaluation is required (287-289).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [288]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 40

Authors
Moreno, S., Guillermo, M., Decoulx, M., Dewailly, D., Bresson, R., & Proye, C.
Affiliations
Université de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Moreno, S.
Venue
Annales d Endocrinologie
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
32-38
ISSN
0003-4266 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W187022410
Cited by
40
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annales d Endocrinologie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Keywords
adrenocortical carcinoma, adult male, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, androgen deficiency, Δ4-androstenedione, adrenalectomy, mitotane, corticosteroid therapy, prognosis, Weiss score, tumor size, differential diagnosis, rare tumor, adrenal tumors
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms, Adrenalectomy, Adult, Androgens, Estrogens, Feminization, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Male, Prognosis, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review