The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective field theory for massive gravitons and gravity in theory space
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We introduce a technique for restoring general coordinate invariance into theories where it is explicitly broken. This is the analog for gravity of the Callan–Coleman–Wess–Zumino formalism for gauge theories. We use this to elucidate the properties of interacting massless and massive gravitons. For a single graviton with a Planck scale M Pl and a mass m g , we find that there is a sensible effective field theory which is valid up to a high-energy cutoff Λ parametrically above m g . Our methods allow for a transparent understanding of the many peculiarities associated with massive gravitons, among them the need for the Fierz–Pauli form of the Lagrangian, the presence or absence of the van Dam–Veltman–Zakharov discontinuity in general backgrounds, and the onset of non-linear effects and the breakdown of the effective theory at large distances from heavy sources. The natural sizes of all non-linear corrections beyond the Fierz–Pauli term are easily determined. The cutoff scales as Λ ∼( m g 4 M Pl ) 1/5 for the Fierz–Pauli theory, but can be raised to Λ ∼( m g 2 M Pl ) 1/3 in certain non-linear extensions. Having established that these models make sense as effective theories, there are a number of new avenues for exploration, including model building with gravity in theory space and constructing gravitational dimensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space
Dvali, G., Gabadadze, G., & Porrati, M. (2000) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00669-9 · Cited by 3,513
Massive and mass-less Yang-Mills and gravitational fields
van Dam, H., & Veltman, M. (1970) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(70)90416-5 · Cited by 1,288
Cited by
Galileon as a local modification of gravity
Nicolis, A., Rattazzi, R., & Trincherini, E. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.064036 · Cited by 1,863
Resummation of Massive Gravity
de Rham, C., Gabadadze, G., & Tolley, A. J. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.231101 · Cited by 1,802
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
de Rham, C. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-7 · Cited by 1,120
From k -essence to generalized Galileons
Deffayet, C., Gao, X., Steer, D. A., & Zahariade, G. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.064039 · Cited by 1,105
Metadata
- Authors
- Arkani-Hamed, N., Georgi, H., & Schwartz, M. D.
- Venue
- Annals of Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 305
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-118
- ISSN
- 0003-4916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975408345
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.