Cited by 124Relativity and Gravitational TheoryAdvanced Differential Geometry ResearchGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows

Reduction of Einstein’s equations for vacuum space-times with spacelike U(1) isometry groups

Open access
Moncrief, Vincent·1986·Annals of Physics

Abstract

We consider vacuum space-times with spacelike U(1) isometry groups which are defined on manifolds of the form R × Bn, where Bn is an arbitrary S1-bundle over the two-sphere. We reduce the Einstein equations for this problem to a system of “harmonic map” equations defined over the base manifold R × S2 equipped with a Lorentzian metric determined uniquely by the solution of an associated nonlinear elliptic system. The harmonic map fields (which have a range space diffeomorphic to the hyperbolic two-plane) represent the unconstrained, dynamical degrees of freedom of the gravitational field. We give a complete discussion of the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the associated elliptic system and also display a Geroch-type solution generating technique for globally transforming the space of solutions associated with any one non-trivial bundle, R × Bn → R × S2, to that of any other such bundle. The basic techniques could readily be generalized to treat S1-bundles over R × M where M is a compact two-manifold of arbitrary genus. In the higher genus cases the Teichmüller space of conformally diffeomorphic Riemannian metrics over M arises as an additional component of the configuration manifold. For M ≈ S2 this space collapses to a point, which slightly simplifies the analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-4916(86)80009-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The phase space of the reduced 2+1 gravity dynamics is the cotangent bundle T*TΣ_p (≈ R^{12p-12}).

    “where the phase space of the dynamics was identified with the co-tangent bundle of Teichmüller space ( ≈ R 12 p -12 ).”
  • The configuration space of the gauge-fixed dynamics of 2+1 gravity on spacetimes of topological type Σ_p × R is the Teichmüller space TΣ_p (≈ R^{6p-6}) of Σ_p.

    “The configuration space of the gauge fixed dynamics is identified with the Teichmüller space ( T Σ p ≈ R 6 p -6 ) of Σ p .”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moncrief, V.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Moncrief, Vincent
Venue
Annals of Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-03
Volume
167
Issue
1
Pages
118-142
ISSN
0003-4916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976591759
Cited by
124
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annals of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Keywords
Einstein field equations, vacuum spacetimes, harmonic maps, nonlinear elliptic systems, existence and uniqueness of solutions, Teichmüller space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review