The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cognitive Outcome After Coronary Artery Bypass: A One-Year Prospective Study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits have been reported in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting, but the incidence of these deficits varies widely. We studied prospectively the incidence of cognitive change and whether the changes persisted over time. METHODS: Cognitive testing was done preoperatively and 1 month and 1 year postoperatively in 127 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Tests were grouped into eight cognitive domains. A change of 0.5 standard deviation or more at 1 month and 1 year from patient's preoperative Z score was the outcome measure. RESULTS: We identified four main outcomes for each cognitive domain: no decline; decline and improvement; persistent decline; and late decline. Only 12% of patients showed no decline across all domains tested; 82% to 90% of patients had no decline in visual memory, psychomotor speed, motor speed, and executive function; 21% and 26% had decline and improvement in verbal memory and language; approximately 10% had persistent decline in the domains of verbal memory, visual memory, attention, and visuoconstruction; and 24% had late decline (between 1 month and 1 year) in visuoconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes that the incidence of cognitive decline varies according to the cognitive domain studied and that some patients have persistent and late cognitive changes in specific domains after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Subcortical ischaemic vascular dementia
Román, G. C., Erkinjuntti, T., Wallin, A., Pantoni, L., & Chui, H. C. (2002) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00190-4 · Cited by 1,067
The assessment of postoperative cognitive function
Rasmussen, L. S., Larsen, K., Houx, P., Skovgaard, L. T., Hanning, C. D., Moller, J. T., & the ISPOCD group (2001) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045003275.x · Cited by 558
Neurocognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review
van Dijk, D., Keizer, A. M. A., Diephuis, J. C., Durand, C., Vos, L. J., & Hijman, R. (2000) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1067/mtc.2000.108901 · Cited by 274
Vascular Dementia Prevention: A Risk Factor Analysis
Román, G. C. (2005) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000089361 · Cited by 150
Link between heart disease, cholesterol, and Alzheimer's disease: A review
Sparks, D. L., Martin, T. A., Gross, D. R., & Hunsaker, J. C. (2000) · Microscopy Research and Technique · doi:10.1002/1097-0029(20000815)50:4<287::aid-jemt7>3.0.co;2-l · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- McKhann, M., Goldsborough, M., Borowicz, M., Selnes, P., Mellits, S., Enger, P., Quaskey, B., Baumgartner, M., Cameron, M., Stuart, M., & Gardner, M.
- Venue
- The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 510-515
- ISSN
- 0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065280573
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Outcome After Coronary Artery Bypass: A One-Year Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0003-4975(96)01057-0
- The paper
- McKhann, M., Goldsborough, M., Borowicz, M., Selnes, P., Mellits, S., Enger, P., Quaskey, B., Baumgartner, M., Cameron, M., Stuart, M., & Gardner, M. (1997). Cognitive Outcome After Coronary Artery Bypass: A One-Year Prospective Study. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(96)01057-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.