The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)
Open accessAbstract
Evidence-based practice involves the use of evidence from systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials, but the extent of this evidence in physiotherapy has not previously been surveyed. The aim of this survey is to describe the quantity and quality of randomised controlled trials and the quantity of systematic reviews relevant to physiotherapy. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) was searched. The quality of trials was assessed with the PEDro scale. The search identified a total of 2,376 randomised controlled trials and 332 systematic reviews. The first trial was published in 1955 and the first review was published in 1982. Since that time, the number of trials and reviews has grown exponentially. The mean PEDro quality score has increased from 2.8 in trials published between 1955 and 1959 to 5.0 for trials published between 1995 and 1999. There is a substantial body of evidence about the effects of physiotherapy. However, there remains scope for improvements in the quality of the conduct and reporting of clinical trials.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Review authors will perform risk of bias assessments and methodological critique independently (AS and second reviewer), and a third person will resolve discrepancies (AB).”
From Protocol for a systematic review of psychological treatment for methamphetamine use: An analysis of methamphetamine use and mental health symptom outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cites
Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM
Sackett, D. L. (2000) · Cited by 5,950
Verhagen, A. P., de Vet, H. C. W., de Bie, R. A., Kessels, A. G. H., Boers, M., Bouter, L. M., & Knipschild, P. G. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00131-0 · Cited by 2,470
Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM
Satya-Murti, S. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.18.2382 · Cited by 1,645
Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research
Streitberger, K., & Kleinhenz, J. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10471-8 · Cited by 906
Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain
Henschke, N., Ostelo, R. W., van Tulder, M. W., Vlaeyen, J. W., Morley, S., Assendelft, W. J., & Main, C. J. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002014.pub3 · Cited by 718
STREPTOMYCIN treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.
D’Esopo, N. D., & Allison, S. T. (1947) · PubMed · Cited by 606
PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy
Sherrington, C., Herbert, R. D., Maher, C. G., & Moseley, A. M. (2000) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1054/math.2000.0372 · Cited by 508
Self-citationBehavioral Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain
van Tulder, M. W., Ostelo, R., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Linton, S. J., Morley, S., & Assendelft, W. J. (2001) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200102010-00012 · Cited by 456
How to use the evidence: assessment and application of scientific evidence
Glasziou, P., Irwig, L., Bain, C., & Colditz, G. A. (2000) · Cited by 378
Moher, D., Cook, Jadad, Tugwell, P., Moher, Jones, Pham, & Klassen (1999) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta3120 · Cited by 364
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Moseley AM, Maher C, Herbert RD and Sherrington C (1999): Reliability of a scale for measuring the methodological quality of clinical trials. Proceedings of the VIIth Cochrane Colloquium. Rome, p. 39.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 910
Yang, F.-A., Wang, H.-Y., Kuo, T.-Y., Peng, C., Liou, T., Escorpizo, R. S., & Chen, H. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0303537 · Cited by 13
Zaidan, P., & da Silva, E. B. (2016) · Fisioterapia em Movimento · doi:10.1590/1980-5918.029.003.ao21 · Cited by 13
“0 were chosen, this being one of the most frequent scores of the RCTs with the studied methodological quality (12).”
Nogueira, N. M., Felappi, C. J., Lima, C. S., & Medeiros, D. M. (2019) · Sport Sciences for Health · doi:10.1007/s11332-019-00571-z · Cited by 13
Paredes, L. L.-C., Valdés-Badilla, P. A., & Guzmán-Muñoz, E. (2021) · Retos · doi:10.47197/retos.v43i0.87756 · Cited by 19
Cho, S.-H., & Shin, I. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9101368 · Cited by 15
“The Center of Evidence-Based Physiotherapy (CEBP), currently headquartered at the University of Sydney, Australia, was established in 1999 [3].”
BackgroundParaskevopoulos, E., Karanasios, S., Gioftsos, G., Tatsios, P. I., Koumantakis, G. Α., & Παπανδρέου, Μ. (2022) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2022.2068097 · Cited by 13
Effect of Long-term Exercise Therapy on Motor Symptoms in Parkinson Disease Patients
Li, X., Gao, Z., Yu, H., Gu, Y., & Yang, G. (2022) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000002052 · Cited by 13
“The PEDro scores greater than 5 were considered to be of high quality (6–8, good; 9–10, excellent), and a score equal to or less than 5 was considered to have a low quality (4–5, acceptable; <4, poor).(33)”
BackgroundA produção de conhecimento em fisioterapia: análise de periódicos nacionais (1996 a 2009)
Virtuoso, J. F., Haupenthal, A., Pereira, N. D., Martins, C., Knabben, R. J., & Andrade, A. (2011) · Fisioterapia em Movimento · doi:10.1590/s0103-51502011000100020 · Cited by 13
Otterman, N. M., Veerbeek, J. M., Schiemanck, S. K., van der Wees, P. J., Nollet, F., & Kwakkel, G. (2016) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1196399 · Cited by 13
“of evidence-based practice.[11,13] The first Dutch clinical practice guideline for physical therapy”
BackgroundGeneralizability of Results from Randomized Controlled Trials in Post-Stroke Physiotherapy
Paci, M., Prestera, C., & Ferrarello, F. (2020) · Physiotherapy Canada · doi:10.3138/ptc-2018-0117 · Cited by 15
Lin, J. (2013) · Journal of Novel Physiotherapies · doi:10.4172/2165-7025.1000170 · Cited by 13
“Finally, we combined 3 articles to analyze the risk of aggressive protocols as compared to traditional protocols in terms of rotator cuff un-healing and re-tear rates by using the fixed-effects model [1,6,20,21].”
MethodBennett, S. H., McKenna, K. T., McCluskey, A., Tooth, L. R., Hoffmann, T., & Strong, J. (2007) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/030802260707001003 · Cited by 13
“The RCTs indexed in OTseeker (or their reporting) were of poor to moderate quality, similar to other areas of health care (Thornley and Adams 1998, Moseley et al 2002).”
ResultPsychological treatment for anxiety in people with traumatic brain injury
Soo, C., & Tate, R. L. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005239 · Cited by 13
Yang, M., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Luo, Z.-R., & Yu, P. (2022) · World Journal of Clinical Cases · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4119 · Cited by 12
Retameiro, A. C. B., Neves, M., Tavares, A. L. D. F., Boaro, C. D. T., Rodriguez, D. F. S., Leal, T. S. D. S., Brancalhão, R. M. C., Bertolini, G. R. F., & Ribeiro, L. D. F. C. (2022) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.25112 · Cited by 12
Klees‐Themens, G., & Théoret, H. (2023) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.16073 · Cited by 12
“The risk of bias was assessed by one reviewer (H. T.) using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro scale; Maher et al., 2003; Moseley et al., 2002).”
MethodTraumatic brain injury and stem cell treatments: A review of recent 10 years clinical trials
Saboori, M., Riazi, A., Taji, M., & Yadegarfar, G. (2024) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108219 · Cited by 12
Rosenstein, B., Rye, M., Roussac, A., Naghdi, N., Macedo, L. G., Elliott, J. M., DeMont, R. G., Weber, M. H., Pepin, V., Dover, G. C., et al. (2025) · Global Spine Journal · doi:10.1177/21925682251324490 · Cited by 14
“41”
Acute Kidney Injury and Hyponatremia in Ultra-Trail Racing: A Systematic Review
Lecina, M., Otín, C. C., López‐Laval, I., Páez, L. C., & de la Fuente, F. P. (2022) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina58050569 · Cited by 16
“sessable with methodologically validated tools such as PEDro [39] or Cochrane Collabo-”
MethodCobo-Mejía, E. A., Prieto-Peralta, M., & Sandoval-Cuéllar, C. (2016) · Rehabilitación · doi:10.1016/j.rh.2015.12.004 · Cited by 17
Virtual reality exposure therapy for neuro-psychomotor recovery in adults: a systematic review
Freitas, L., Val, S. N. D. A., Magalhães, F. E. X., Marinho, V., Ayres, C., Teixeira, S. S., & Bastos, V. H. (2019) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1688400 · Cited by 12
“Studies with a total PEDro score from 7 to 11 were considered high quality, scores below 7 were recognized as considerable quality [36].”
BackgroundA critical evaluation of evidence-based practice of physiotherapy in musculoskeletal medicine
Chan, S., & Clough, A. (2010) · International Musculoskeletal Medicine · doi:10.1179/1753615410y.0000000006 · Cited by 12
The awareness and use of outcome measures by South African physiotherapists
Inglis-Jassiem, G., Faure, M., & Frieg, A. (2008) · South African Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.4102/sajp.v64i2.102 · Cited by 12
What Searches Do Users Run on PEDro?
Moseley, A. M., Elkins, M. R., Lin, C., Maher, C. G., & Stevens, M. L. (2016) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me15-01-0143 · Cited by 12
Self-citationMine, K., Lei, D., & Nakayama, T. (2018) · International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.26603/ijspt20180789 · Cited by 15
Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke
Barclay, R., Stevenson, T. J., Poluha, W., & Thalman, L. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005950.pub3 · Cited by 12
Lei, Z., Yuan, K., Xu, J., Miao, Y., Dai, Y., Wang, J., & Chang, J. (2025) · BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s13102-025-01222-2 · Cited by 21
“The two independent researchers performed the methodological quality assessment of all research papers in line with the scale for randomized clinical trials from the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) [26].”
Factors associated with citation rate of randomised controlled trials in physiotherapy
Paci, M., Landi, N., Briganti, G., & Lombardi, B. (2015) · Archives of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1186/s40945-015-0009-6 · Cited by 11
“The PEDro database provides the assessment of the reported methodological quality of each RCT using the PEDro scale [19, 20], which rates 11 aspects of methodological quality of RCTs as being either absent or present.”
MethodLindsay, A., Abbott, G., Ingalls, C. P., & Baumann, C. W. (2020) · The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000003924 · Cited by 11
“All studies were assessed for quality on the basis of the Physiotherapy Evidence-Based Database (PEDro) scale (46).”
BackgroundHan, X., Li, P., Yang, Y., Liu, X., Xia, J., & Wu, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.691554 · Cited by 12
“Quality Assessment Physiotherapy evidence database scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies (20).”
MethodBorrego-Sánchez, A., Viñolo-Gil, M. J., Almeida, M. D. L. C., Rodríguez-Huguet, M., Casuso-Holgado, M. J., & Martín‐Valero, R. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182413332 · Cited by 11
Kohler, B. E., Sandler, C. X., Baque, E., Bradford, N., & Trost, S. G. (2022) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2022.979292 · Cited by 13
Ehsani, F., Arab, A. M., & Jaberzadeh, S. J. (2017) · Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation · doi:10.3233/bmr-150361 · Cited by 11
“According to the study design, we used the PEDro scale for methodological quality assessment of the included articles with randomized control trial (RCT) design [30,31].”
Near-infrared spectroscopy as a quantitative spasticity assessment tool: A systematic review
McDougall, J., Chow, E., Harris, R. L., & Mills, P. B. (2020) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2020.116729 · Cited by 11
Pereira, V. S., Escobar, A. C., & Driusso, P. (2012) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · Cited by 11
Behrangrad, S., Zoghi, M., Kidgell, D. J., & Jaberzadeh, S. J. (2021) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2020.0872 · Cited by 11
“Two researchers independently reviewed each article and gave a quality score by using the Downs and Black tool (Moher et al., 2009; Moseley et al., 2002).”
Hoffmann, T., Bennett, S. H., McKenna, K. T., Green-Hill, J., McCluskey, A., & Tooth, L. R. (2008) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/tsr1504-341 · Cited by 11
García-Alonso, A., González, J. L. S., Navarro‐López, V., Sánchez, R. M., & Polo-Ferrero, L. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17223624 · Cited by 10
“The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Phys-iotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale [34].”
Siddiqui, S. H., & Rossi, N. F. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16020219 · Cited by 10
“Nonetheless, this scale helps select effective articles for the meta-analysis and helps perform statistical analysis of the data from the selected articles [31].”
MethodKhaledi, A., Minoonejad, H., Akoochakian, M., & Gheitasi, M. (2024) · Iranian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.18502/ijph.v53i1.14685 · Cited by 10
Effects of strength training on repeated sprint ability in team sports players: a systematic review
Osses-Rivera, A., Yáñez-Sepúlveda, R., Jannas-Vela, S., Vigh-Larsen, J. F., & Monsalves‐Álvarez, M. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.17756 · Cited by 10
“The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality of the included studies ( Moseley et al., 2002 ).”
MethodFenton, J. M., King, J. A., Hoekstra, S. P., Valentino, S. E., Phillips, S. M., & Goosey-Tolfrey, V. L. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2063420 · Cited by 10
Hyperbaric oxygen in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review of effectiveness and safety
Laureau, J., Pons, C., Letellier, G., & Gross, R. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276126 · Cited by 10
“The quality of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Assessment Scale (PEDro) [22].”
MethodSuitable hepatitis B vaccine for adult immunization in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wu, Z., Bao, H., Yao, J., Chen, Y., Lu, S., Li, J., Jiang, Z., Ren, J., Xu, K., Ruan, B., et al. (2018) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2018.1509172 · Cited by 10
Kelly, G. A., Reilly, A. S., Moloney, H., Moran, J., Cunningham, C., & Broderick, J. M. (2018) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.physio.2018.08.005 · Cited by 10
Pelai, E. B., Mescollotto, F. F., de Castro‐Carletti, E. M., de Moraes, M., & Rodrigues-Bigaton, D. (2020) · CRANIO® · doi:10.1080/08869634.2020.1831836 · Cited by 10
“The studies were classified as having high methodological quality if the score obtained was greater than or equal to 50% of the maximum possible score [19,20], which, in the present systematic review, was greater than or equal to seven points.”
BackgroundMeidian, A. C., Wahyuddin, W., & Amimoto, K. (2020) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2020.1831554 · Cited by 10
“There are 11 rating items on the PEDro score (Moseley et al., 2002).”
BackgroundMoreno-Villanueva, A., Pino‐Ortega, J., & Rico-González, M. (2021) · Strength and conditioning journal · doi:10.1519/ssc.0000000000000695 · Cited by 9
“This scale has been widely used to assess the quality of studies in physiotherapy and RTand has proven to be a valid measure of the methodological quality of randomized trials (9) showing acceptable interrater reliability (44).”
MethodDi‐Bonaventura, S., Fernández‐Carnero, J., Matesanz-García, L., Arribas‐Romano, A., Polli, A., & Peña, R. F. (2023) · Life · doi:10.3390/life13010163 · Cited by 10
Alba-Rueda, A., Miguel-Rubio, A. D., & Lucena-Antón, D. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14090896 · Cited by 9
“The PEDro scale was used to assess the included RCTs as a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials for physical therapy [53].”
MethodCorey, J. J., Tsai, J. M., Mhadeshwar, A. B., Srinivasan, S. M., & Bhat, A. N. (2024) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/jir.13169 · Cited by 13
Rosenstein, B., Montpetit, C., Vaillancourt, N., Dover, G. C., Weiss, C., Papula, L. A., Melek, A., & Fortin, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-00210-3 · Cited by 10
“Only the assessor was blinded to the characteristics of the participants and their respective groups, as therapist and participant blinding is generally not possible in exercise trials 34 .”
Teaching Methodologies for First Aid in Physical Education in Secondary Schools: A Systematic Review
Parada-Espinosa, J. M., Ortega‐Gómez, S., Ruiz-Muñoz, M., & Gónzález-Silva, J. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13101112 · Cited by 9
“The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the PEDro scale [30,32], a tool validated for quasi-experimental studies and controlled clinical trials.”
Alhasan, H. S., Alandijani, E., Bahamdan, L., Khudary, G., Aburaya, Y., Awali, A., & Alshehri, M. A. (2025) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/67146 · Cited by 9
“The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) assessment tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies [54].”
Abidin, M. Z. R. Z., Yunus, F. W., Rasdi, H. F. M., & Kadar, M. (2021) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/0308022620980683 · Cited by 9
“The physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale (Moseley et al., 2002) was employed to assess the methodological quality of the RCT studies.”
MethodSimpkins, C., Khalili, S. M., & Yang, F. (2024) · Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research · doi:10.20900/agmr20240002 · Cited by 9
“PEDro scores were extracted from the official PEDro database [26].”
MethodEvidence base, quantitation and collaboration: three novel indices for bibliometric content analysis
Wiles, L., Olds, T., & Williams, M. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0163-2 · Cited by 10
Jiang, T., Su, B., Song, T., Zhu, Z., Xia, W., Dai, L., Wang, W., Zhang, T., & Wu, H. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01023 · Cited by 9
Teaching pain management to health professional students: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ashton, S., Kilby, M., Wu, J., & Lo, K. (2022) · British Journal of Pain · doi:10.1177/20494637211063384 · Cited by 9
Joshi, D., Gyanpuri, V., Pathak, A., Chaurasia, R. N., Mishra, V. N., Kumar, A., Singh, V. K., Raj, D., & Dhiman, N. R. (2022) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-022-07396-6 · Cited by 9
“This measure evaluates the methodological quality and consists of an 11-item checklist, with 10 of them being assessed [16].”
Corominas-Teruel, X., Mozo, R. M. S. S., Fibla, M., Colomina, M. T., & Valero‐Cabré, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.953939 · Cited by 9
“The PEDro scale has been proven valid and reliable (61) to evaluate the methodological quality of a set of eligible studies (62), based on the Delphi List criteria (63).”
MethodAn Overview of Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Randomized Controlled Trials
McIntyre, A., Janzen, S. E., Richardson, M., Kwok, C., & Teasell, R. W. (2015) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000108 · Cited by 9
Simmons, L., & Smith, T. O. (2012) · Physical Therapy Reviews · doi:10.1179/1743288x12y.0000000035 · Cited by 9
Use of antidepressants in dentistry: A systematic review
Lino, P. A., Martins, C. C., Miranda, G., Silva, M. D. S. E., & de Abreu, M. H. N. G. (2017) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/odi.12747 · Cited by 9
Rodríguez-Mansilla, J., Espejo-Antúnez, L., & Bustamante-López, A. I. (2015) · Atención Primaria · doi:10.1016/j.aprim.2015.05.004 · Cited by 9
Quality of the Stroke Rehabilitation Research
Bhogal, S. K., Teasell, R. W., Foley, N. C., & Speechley, M. R. (2003) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/31pk-d1j8-1fbn-0k3k · Cited by 9
Anttila, H. (2008) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 9
Mogedano-Cruz, S., López-Pérez, M. E., Lago, D. G., Morales, C. R., Alonso-Pérez, J. L., Villafañe, J. H., Sáiz, S. L. J., & Sosa-Reina, M. D. (2024) · Pain Management Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.005 · Cited by 8
da Silva, J. V. M. B., Delgado, J. C. S., Hortúa, A. M. J., Veiga, A. C., Andrade, G. V., Rodrigues, M. R., & de Souza, H. C. D. (2025) · Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research · doi:10.1590/1414-431x2025e14194 · Cited by 16
Current state of evidence-based practice in clinical physiotherapy
Roos, R. (2025) · South African Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2139 · Cited by 8
“…evidence, for example, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and synthesis of research evidence, for example, systematic reviews (SRs) and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as part of EBP and to inform evidence-based physiotherapy, has significantly increased over time (Moseley et al. 2002, 2020).”
Influentialla-Banda-García, R. G.-D., Cruz‐Díaz, D., García-Vázquez, J. F., Martínez-Lentisco, M. D. M., & León-Morillas, F. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13111328 · Cited by 8
“Risk of bias assessment will be independently performed by two unblinded reviewers, and disagreements will be resolved by consensus [23].”
Hopman, K., Tate, R. L., & McCluskey, A. (2012) · Brain Impairment · doi:10.1017/brimp.2012.6 · Cited by 8
Willig, R., Garcia, I., da Silva, N. S. L., Corredeira, R., & Carvalho, J. (2020) · Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine (JSCM) · doi:10.1080/10790268.2020.1782608 · Cited by 9
Oh, S., & Lee, S. (2021) · Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.01.009 · Cited by 8
Armijo-Olivo, S. L., da Costa, B. R., Ha, C., Saltaji, H., Cummings, G. G., & Fuentes, J. (2021) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000001837 · Cited by 8
Siddiqui, S. H., Khan, M., Choe, H. S., Kang, D., & Shim, K. S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18985-0 · Cited by 8
“Nonetheless, the PEDro scale assists in analyzing the statistical information of primarily selected journals and helps in selecting effective literature for meta-analysis 44 .”
Kwon, J.-S. (2018) · Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives · doi:10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.2.04 · Cited by 8
Saeidiborojeni, S., Mills, P. B., Reebye, R. N., & Finlayson, H. C. (2020) · Toxicon · doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.10.005 · Cited by 8
Supportive devices for preventing and treating subluxation of the shoulder after stroke
Ada, L., Foongchomcheay, A., & Canning, C. G. (2002) · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003863 · Cited by 8
Stuart, A., Baker, A. L., Bowman, J., McCarter, K., Denham, A. M. J., Lee, N., Colyvas, K., & Dunlop, A. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015383 · Cited by 7
“If disagreement occurs, final ratings will be made via consensus, following discussion with coauthors.(46) The ‘Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias’ tool will be used to measure risk of bias(45) with items judged as low, high or unclear risk.”
MethodChamorro-Moriana, G., Pérez‐Cabezas, V., & Benítez-Lugo, M.-L. (2024) · EFORT Open Reviews · doi:10.1530/eor-23-0129 · Cited by 7
Mobile Application Applied for Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
Cha, S.-M. (2024) · Life · doi:10.3390/life14070891 · Cited by 7
“It responds qualitative evaluation from a methodological perspective is conducted with 9–10 points being ‘excellent’, 6–8 points being ‘good’, 4–5 points being ‘fair’, and 4 points or less being ‘poor’ [20]. with ‘Yes’ or ‘No’, and the maximum score is 10 points (the number of ‘Yes’).”
MethodSafaei-Qomi, M. R., Mehrabi, S., Fleet, J. L., Peters, S., Viana, R., Payne, M. W. C., Tang, A., & Teasell, R. W. (2024) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000002638 · Cited by 7
Piñar-Lara, M., Obrero‐Gaitán, E., Lomas‐Vega, R., López‐Ruiz, M. D. C., García‐López, H., & Cortés‐Pérez, I. (2025) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2025.2458186 · Cited by 7
“The methodological quality and risk of bias was evaluated using the PeDro scale [45].”
Wan, C., Huang, S., Wang, X., Ge, P., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., & Su, B. (2023) · Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine · doi:10.1080/10790268.2023.2188392 · Cited by 7
“Quality Assessment (Risk of Bias) : The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess the quality of the studies, measuring methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (17).”
MethodEffects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
de Arruda, N. S., Peixoto, N. D. M., Callegaro, C. C., Trevisan, M. E., & Jaenisch, R. B. (2023) · Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0366 · Cited by 7
“It were considered high quality (> 7 points), moderate quality (6 or 5 points), and low quality (≤ 4 points)[23].”
BackgroundRosenstein, B., Montpetit, C., Vaillancourt, N., Dover, G. C., Khalini-Mahani, N., Weiss, C., Papula, L. A., Melek, A., & Fortin, M. (2023) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-023-07034-0 · Cited by 7
“Since blinding of therapists and participants is generally not possible in exercise intervention trials [50], only the assessor will be blinded.”
BackgroundAcupuncture and dry needling for physical therapy of scar: a systematic review
Chmielewska, D. D., Malá, J., Opala-Berdzik, A., Nocuń, M., Dolibog, P., Dolibog, P., Stania, M., Kuszewski, M., & Kobesova, A. (2024) · BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · doi:10.1186/s12906-023-04301-4 · Cited by 7
“The Phys-iotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale consists of 10 questions pertaining to the internal validity and statistical information provided [11].”
BackgroundDutra, M. F., de Bessa, J., de Almeida, E. C. L., Lima, E. M., Vasconcelos, M. M. D. A., & Mrad, F. C. D. C. (2024) · International braz j urol · doi:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2023.0618 · Cited by 7
“It assesses 11 items related to the study internal validity (two to nine) and statistical reporting (10 and 11), except for the first one (eligibility criteria), which is not computed in the total score (46).”
BackgroundSilva, L. G. D. C., da Silva, S. L. A., Freire, J. C. G., Nascimento, E. D. S., de Andrade, P. R., Pereira, D. S., & de Brito, G. E. G. (2024) · Physiotherapy Research International · doi:10.1002/pri.2092 · Cited by 7
“The scale has 11 items, with each criterion (except item 1) contributing one point to the total score, so the score ranges from 0 to 10 (Maher et al., 2003), and those who achieve a score ≥ 5 are considered high quality, according to Moseley et al. (2002).”
Mehrabi, S., Fleet, J. L., Safaei-Qomi, M. R., Dukelow, S. P., Murie-Fernández, M., Harnett, A., & Teasell, R. W. (2024) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.029 · Cited by 7
Majelan, A. S., Shahani, O., Zo, M. A. S. G., & Far, M. A. (2025) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-025-08823-5 · Cited by 7
“Studies scoring below 4 are considered to be of low quality [26].”
Neuromuscular Training for Prevention of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Female Athletes
Chang, W., & Lai, P.-T. (2014) · International Journal of Athletic Therapy & Training · doi:10.1123/ijatt.2014-0042 · Cited by 7
Wiener, J., Hsieh, J., McIntyre, A., & Teasell, R. W. (2018) · Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/sci17-00048 · Cited by 7
“Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) tool (Table 1).(15) The PEDro tool consists of 11 items, each answered with “yes” (score = 1) or “no” (score = 0).”
MethodPrat-Luri, A., Moreno-Navarro, P., García, J. A., Barbado, D., Vera-García, F. J., & Elvira, J. L. L. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17238714 · Cited by 7
“Based on this scale, studies were categorized as follows: excellent (9–10 points), good (6–8 points), fair (4–5 points), and poor (<4 points) [32].”
MethodThe safety and efficacy of oral antiviral drug VV116 for treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review
Xiao, N., Huang, X., Kang, X., Zang, W., Li, B., & Kiselev, S. Y. (2023) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000034105 · Cited by 7
“Study quality assessment To thoroughly assess the quality of the included literature, we used the PEDro scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Table (ROB) to evaluate the quality and internal validity of the RCTs.[35] This scale consists of eleven scoring items, and as with the previously published articles,[36] a PEDro…”
MethodInfluentialHassan, A. B., Salihu, A. T., Masta, M. A., Gunn, H., Marsden, J. F., Abdullahi, A., Ahmad, R. Y., & Danazumi, M. S. (2023) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/s41393-023-00928-9 · Cited by 7
“Generally, studies scoring ≥ 6 out of 10 were considered high-quality, while studies scoring 6 out of 10 were considered low-quality [46].”
Uso da kinesio taping na dor lombar: revisão sistemática
Batista, C. V., Ruaro, J. A., Ruaro, M. B., Julik, A. D., Kerppers, I. I., Suckow, P. P. T., Melo, S. D. A., & Fréz, A. R. (2014) · ConScientiae Saúde · doi:10.5585/conssaude.v13n1.4589 · Cited by 7
Effects of stretching exercises for posture correction: systematic review.
Filho, J. N. D. S., Gurgel, J. L., & Porto, F. (2014) · Manual Therapy Posturology & Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.17784/mtprehabjournal.2014.12.200 · Cited by 6
“1%) of the analyzed studies(24,26,42,43) had low methodological quality(41) and less than half (42.”
InfluentialOccupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients
Hoffmann, T., Bennett, S. H., Koh, C., & McKenna, K. T. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006430 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Moseley, A. M., Herbert, R. D., Sherrington, C., & Maher, C. G.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Moseley, Anne M
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Physiotherapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-49
- ISSN
- 0004-9514 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042355753
- Cited by
- 911
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 23.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Physiotherapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- physiotherapy, evidence-based practice, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, trial quality, PEDro scale, trial reporting quality
- MeSH terms
- Australia, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Factual, Evidence-Based Medicine, Physical Therapy Modalities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review