The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maximum solubility of cholesterol in phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine bilayers
Open accessAbstract
In any lipid bilayer membrane, there is an upper limit on the cholesterol concentration that can be accommodated within the bilayer structure; excess cholesterol will precipitate as crystals of pure cholesterol monohydrate. This cholesterol solubility limit is a well-defined quantity. It is a first-order phase boundary in the phospholipid/cholesterol phase diagram. There are many different solubility limits in the literature, but no clear picture has emerged that can unify the disparate results. We have studied the effects that different sample preparation methods can have on the apparent experimental solubility limit. We find that artifactual demixing of cholesterol can occur during conventional sample preparation and that this demixed cholesterol may produce artifactual cholesterol crystals. Therefore, phospholipid/cholesterol suspensions which are prepared by conventional methods may manifest variable, falsely low cholesterol solubility limits. We have developed two novel preparative methods which are specifically designed to prevent demixing during sample preparation. For detection of the cholesterol crystals, X-ray diffraction has proven to be quantitative and highly sensitive. Experiments based on these methods yield reproducible and precise cholesterol solubility limits: 66 mol% for phosphatidylcholine (PC) bilayers and 51 mol% for phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) bilayers. We present evidence that these are true, equilibrium values. In contrast to the dramatic headgroup effect (PC vs. PE), acyl chain variations had no effect on the cholesterol solubility limit in four different PC/cholesterol mixtures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lipids in exosomes: current knowledge and the way forward
Skotland, T., Sandvig, K., & Llorente, A. (2017) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2017.03.001 · Cited by 1,030
Cholesterol interactions with phospholipids in membranes
Ohvo-Rekilä, H. (2002) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0163-7827(01)00020-0 · Cited by 1,003
Docosahexaenoic acid: Membrane properties of a unique fatty acid
Stillwell, W., & Wassall, S. R. (2003) · Chemistry and Physics of Lipids · doi:10.1016/s0009-3084(03)00101-4 · Cited by 872
Exosomal lipid composition and the role of ether lipids and phosphoinositides in exosome biology
Skotland, T., Hessvik, N. P., Sandvig, K., & Llorente, A. (2019) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r084343 · Cited by 730
A Microscopic Interaction Model of Maximum Solubility of Cholesterol in Lipid Bilayers
Huang, J., & Feigenson, G. W. (1999) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(99)77369-8 · Cited by 594
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, J., Buboltz, J. T., & Feigenson, G. W.
- Venue
- Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 1417
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-100
- ISSN
- 0005-2736 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001052983
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum solubility of cholesterol in phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine bilayers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0005-2736(98)00260-0
- The paper
- Huang, J., Buboltz, J. T., & Feigenson, G. W. (1999). Maximum solubility of cholesterol in phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine bilayers. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-2736(98)00260-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.