Cited by 91Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Do changes in dysfunctional attitudes mediate changes in depression and anxiety in cognitive behavioral therapy?

Burns, David D., Spangler, Diane L.·2001·Behavior Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7894(01)80008-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 91

Authors
Burns, D. D., & Spangler, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Burns, David D.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
337-369
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013938639
Cited by
91
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
dysfunctional attitudes, depression, anxiety, cognitive behavioral therapy, mediation, circular causality, common cause hypothesis, negative emotions, outpatients, psychotherapy outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review