Further tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder: Metacognitions and worry in GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, depression, and nonpatients
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differences in beliefs about uncontrollability and danger remained when the frequency of type 1 worry was statistically controlled.
“Differences in beliefs about uncontrollability and danger remained when the frequency of type 1 worry was statistically controlled.”
From Metacognitive Theory and Therapy for Worry and Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Review and Status (2010) · cites this paper as Wells and Carter (2001)
The GAD group could be distinguished from the other groups in endorsing significantly higher negative metacognitive beliefs in two domains: (1) uncontrollability and danger, and (2) need for control focusing on negative consequences of not controlling thoughts.
“The GAD group could be distinguished from the other groups in endorsing significantly higher negative metacognitive beliefs in two domains: (1) uncontrollability and danger, and (2) need for control focusing on negative consequences of not controlling thoughts.”
From Metacognitive Theory and Therapy for Worry and Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Review and Status (2010) · cites this paper as Wells and Carter (2001)
Wells and Carter (2001) compared patients with GAD against gender-matched patients with social phobia, panic disorder and non-patient controls.
“Wells and Carter (2001) compared patients with GAD against gender-matched patients with social phobia, panic disorder and non-patient controls.”
From Metacognitive Theory and Therapy for Worry and Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Review and Status (2010) · cites this paper as Wells and Carter (2001)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 373
- Authors
- Wells, A., & Carter, K.
- ORCID
- Carter, Karin
- Venue
- Behavior Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-102
- ISSN
- 0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054228887
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 10.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Keywords
- generalized anxiety disorder, metacognition, meta-worry, pathological worry, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, cognitive therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
