One versus five sessions of exposure in the treatment of injection phobia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One-session treatment for specific phobias yields outcomes comparable to five sessions, with gains maintained up to four years.
“One-session treatment of flying phobia, blood-injection-injury phobia, spider phobia, claustrophobia, and other specific phobias has shown comparable outcomes to five-session treatment, with clinically significant improvements maintained for follow-up periods as long as four years (Öst, Alm, Brandberg, & Breitholtz, 2001; Öst, Brandberg, & Alm, 1997; Öst, Hellström, & Kåver, 1992).”
From Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure (2019) · cites this paper as Öst, Hellström, & Kåver, 1992
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 165
- Authors
- Öst, L.-G., Hellström, K., & Kåver, A.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Öst, Lars-Göran
- ORCID
- Öst, Lars-Göran
- Venue
- Behavior Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 263-281
- ISSN
- 0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078572578
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Keywords
- injection phobia, specific phobia, exposure therapy, number of treatment sessions, treatment duration, treatment outcomes, long-term follow-up
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
