Reinforcement effects on intrinsic interest: Undermining the overjustification hypothesis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the 5 within-subject studies showed significant undermining.
“It is true that none of the 5 studies showed significant under- mining, but one can conclude very little.”
From A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1999) · cites this paper as Feingold & Mahoney, 1975
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 116
- Authors
- Feingold, B. D., & Mahoney, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feingold, Barnet D.
- ORCID
- Mahoney, Michael J.
- Venue
- Behavior Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1975-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-377
- ISSN
- 0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044493527
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- intrinsic motivation, extrinsic rewards, token reinforcement, children's play, picture completion, operant performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
