The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary meta-analysis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pharmacological and psychological treatments for GAD have demonstrated their efficacy.
“Treatments for GAD include pharmacological and psychological and both have demonstrated their efficacy [21].”
From Low-intensity internet-delivered treatment for generalized anxiety symptoms in routine care: protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2014) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, R. A., Otto, M. W., Pollack, M. H., & Yap, L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gould, Robert A.
- Venue
- Behavior Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 285-305
- ISSN
- 0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992183523
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- generalized anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, treatment efficacy, depression severity, maintenance of treatment gains, drug discontinuation, anxiety levels, methodological factors, gender differences, treatment duration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
