Cited by 42Temporomandibular Joint DisordersOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Use of a habit reversal treatment for temporomandibular pain in a minimal therapist contact format.

Townsend, Donald, Nicholson, Rob A., Buenaver, Luis, Bush, Francis, Gramling, Sandra·2001·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that a habit reversal treatment might be used effectively in a home-based minimal therapist contact (MTC) protocol to facilitate flexibility and increase treatment completion rates. Recent reviews of MTC interventions have found it to be generally efficacious, cost-effective, and generalizable. While MTC has been used for certain health-related disorders (e.g., headache), almost no research has evaluated the effectiveness of a MTC protocol with a population suffering from temporomandibular disorder (TMD). The current study utilized an oral habit reversal treatment in a MTC format in an attempt to reduce attrition and increase treatment flexibility. Twenty females suffering from TMD were randomly assigned to either a treatment (n = 10) or a wait-list control (n = 10) condition. Six individuals in each group used telephone contact while 4 used e-mail for weekly communication with the therapist. Results demonstrated that a habit reversal treatment in a MTC format led to statistically and clinically significant improvements in mean weekly pain ratings, number of pain-free days per week, and highest weekly pain ratings. Also, a significant reduction in maladaptive oral habits occurred from pre- to post-treatment and significant reductions in life stress and pain interference were observed. Results were maintained at follow-up. The implications for the use of MTC for treatment of facial pain are discussed, as are the implications of these findings for the role of oral habits in the etiology of TMD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7916(02)00004-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 42

Authors
Townsend, D., Nicholson, R. A., Buenaver, L., Bush, F., & Gramling, S.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Gramling, Sandra
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-12
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
221-239
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059316455
Cited by
42
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, temporomandibular joint pain, home-based therapy, telephone therapy, email communication, facial pain, treatment discontinuation, pain interference, life events, treatment flexibility
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Behavior Therapy, Facial Pain, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Habits, Humans, Middle Aged, Muscle Relaxation, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Treatment Outcome, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review