The transfer of avoidance evoking functions through stimulus equivalence classes
Abstract
Recent research in the area of stimulus equivalence suggests that transfer of function via members of stimulus equivalence classes may have relevance to human emotional responding and the development and generalization of certain psychological disorders. This study investigated the transfer of avoidance evoking functions through equivalence classes. Eight subjects were trained in the necessary relations for two-four member stimulus equivalence classes to emerge. Next, using an on-baseline classical conditioning procedure, one member of one class was paired with shock while one member of the other class was presented without shock. Then, while subjects engaged a key-press task, a differential, signalled avoidance task was introduced wherein shock was avoided if a response occurred to the stimulus previously associated with shock. The remaining stimuli from both classes were then presented. The behavior of all eight subjects showed the differential transfer of the avoidance evoking function. The clinical and theoretical implications of the results are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Working with undergraduate students, Augustson and Dougher (1997) first showed that a fixed ratio schedule requirement of shock cancellation learned in the presence of one CS readily transferred to indirectly related stimuli through derived stimulus equivalence ('sameness') relations.
“Working with undergraduate students, Augustson and Dougher (1997) first showed that a fixed ratio (FR) schedule requirement of shock cancellation learned in the presence of one CS readily transferred to indirectly related stimuli through derived stimulus equivalence ('sameness') relations.”
From Relapse of anxiety-related fear and avoidance: Conceptual analysis of treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy (2020) · cites this paper as Augustson and Dougher (1997)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 131
- Authors
- Augustson, E. M., & Dougher, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama (US)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Corresponding author
- Augustson, Erik M.
- Venue
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 181-191
- ISSN
- 0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971530954
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- stimulus equivalence classes, transfer of functions, avoidance learning, classical conditioning, shock avoidance, emotional responses, mental illness, generalization
- MeSH terms
- Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Transfer, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review