Cited by 131Memory and Neural MechanismsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The transfer of avoidance evoking functions through stimulus equivalence classes

Augustson, Erik M., Dougher, Michael J.·1997·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Recent research in the area of stimulus equivalence suggests that transfer of function via members of stimulus equivalence classes may have relevance to human emotional responding and the development and generalization of certain psychological disorders. This study investigated the transfer of avoidance evoking functions through equivalence classes. Eight subjects were trained in the necessary relations for two-four member stimulus equivalence classes to emerge. Next, using an on-baseline classical conditioning procedure, one member of one class was paired with shock while one member of the other class was presented without shock. Then, while subjects engaged a key-press task, a differential, signalled avoidance task was introduced wherein shock was avoided if a response occurred to the stimulus previously associated with shock. The remaining stimuli from both classes were then presented. The behavior of all eight subjects showed the differential transfer of the avoidance evoking function. The clinical and theoretical implications of the results are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7916(97)00008-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Working with undergraduate students, Augustson and Dougher (1997) first showed that a fixed ratio schedule requirement of shock cancellation learned in the presence of one CS readily transferred to indirectly related stimuli through derived stimulus equivalence ('sameness') relations.

    “Working with undergraduate students, Augustson and Dougher (1997) first showed that a fixed ratio (FR) schedule requirement of shock cancellation learned in the presence of one CS readily transferred to indirectly related stimuli through derived stimulus equivalence ('sameness') relations.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 131

Authors
Augustson, E. M., & Dougher, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Augustson, Erik M.
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-09
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
181-191
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971530954
Cited by
131
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
stimulus equivalence classes, transfer of functions, avoidance learning, classical conditioning, shock avoidance, emotional responses, mental illness, generalization
MeSH terms
Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Transfer, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review