Cited by 142Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

An examination of the decline in fear and disgust during exposure-based treatment

Smits, J.A.J, Telch, M.J, Randall, P.K·2002·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

It has been suggested that disgust plays a prominent role in the fear of spiders. Participants (N=27) displaying marked spider fear were provided 30 min of self-directed in vivo exposure to an actual tarantula, during which time their fear and disgust levels were assessed repeatedly. Growth curve analyses were then conducted to examine the decay slopes in both fear and disgust and their relationship. Consistent with prediction, exposure led to significant declines in both spider fear and spider-specific disgust but not in global disgust sensitivity. However, the decay slope observed for fear was significantly greater than that for disgust. Further analyses revealed that the reduction in disgust during treatment remained significant even after controlling for change in fear; and similarly, change in fear remained significant even after controlling for change in disgust. Contrary to prediction, disgust levels at pretreatment did not moderate the level of fear activation or fear reduction during treatment. Theoretical and clinical implications of the findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00094-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since disgust habituates more slowly than fear, variable exposure may have weaker effects on contamination fear than on other phobias.

    “Because disgust habituates more slowly than fear (McKay, 2006; Smits, Telch, & Randall, 2002), it is possible that the effects of variable exposure on contamination fear, in which disgust is a key component, may be weaker than its effects on other phobias.”

    From Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure (2019) · cites this paper as Smits, Telch, & Randall, 2002

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 142

Authors
Smits, J. A. J., Telch, M. J., & Randall, P. K.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Telch, M.J
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
1243-1253
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120463044
Cited by
142
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
spider phobia, disgust, in vivo exposure therapy, fear extinction, disgust sensitivity, tarantulas, phobia treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Fear, Female, Humans, Phobic Disorders, Photic Stimulation, Severity of Illness Index, Spiders, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review