Cited by 232Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPediatric Pain Management Techniques

The assessment of anxiety and fear in persons with chronic pain: A comparison of instruments

Mccracken, Lance M., Gross, Richard T., Aikens, James, Carnrike, C.L.M.·1996·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Instruments used to study anxiety and fear responses related to chronic pain vary along two dimensions. They differ in terms of the stimuli or situations that evoke anxiety responses and the types of anxiety responses included (i.e. cognitive, motoric, and physiological). This study examined relations of variables from the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), the Fear of Pain Questionnaire (FPQ), and the trait version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) with variables related to pain severity, perceived disability, and pain behavior. Subjects were 45 consecutive referrals to a university pain clinic who completed these measures during their evaluation. Results suggested that anxiety responses directly related to the patient's particular pain sensations are more relevant to the understanding of chronic pain than are more general tendencies to respond anxiously or fear more varied pain stimuli. Regression analyses showed that empirically selected subsets of the anxiety variables predict from 16 to 54% of the variance in pain severity, disability and pain behavior. Also, assessment of multiple anxiety response types appears useful for understanding pain behavior and disability. Further study of fear and anxiety responses of persons with pain is likely to benefit from careful selection of measures dependent on the stimulus and response dimensions assessed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00057-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 232

Authors
Mccracken, L. M., Gross, R. T., Aikens, J., & Carnrike, C. L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
Corresponding author
Mccracken, Lance M.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
34
Issue
11-12
Pages
927-933
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061757607
Cited by
232
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, anxiety, fear, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, pain intensity, disability, pain behavior, instrument comparison
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Personality Inventory, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review