The assessment of anxiety and fear in persons with chronic pain: A comparison of instruments
Abstract
Instruments used to study anxiety and fear responses related to chronic pain vary along two dimensions. They differ in terms of the stimuli or situations that evoke anxiety responses and the types of anxiety responses included (i.e. cognitive, motoric, and physiological). This study examined relations of variables from the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), the Fear of Pain Questionnaire (FPQ), and the trait version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) with variables related to pain severity, perceived disability, and pain behavior. Subjects were 45 consecutive referrals to a university pain clinic who completed these measures during their evaluation. Results suggested that anxiety responses directly related to the patient's particular pain sensations are more relevant to the understanding of chronic pain than are more general tendencies to respond anxiously or fear more varied pain stimuli. Regression analyses showed that empirically selected subsets of the anxiety variables predict from 16 to 54% of the variance in pain severity, disability and pain behavior. Also, assessment of multiple anxiety response types appears useful for understanding pain behavior and disability. Further study of fear and anxiety responses of persons with pain is likely to benefit from careful selection of measures dependent on the stimulus and response dimensions assessed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients scoring high on pain-related anxiety and fear score higher on pain behavior and help-seeking.
“pain behavior and help-seeking,73”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [73]
The PASS-20 is a valid and reliable measure of anxiety symptoms in pain populations.
“The instrument is a valid and reliable measure of anxiety symptoms in pain populations.35,48”
From Telehealth Versus In-Person Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. (2017) · cites this paper as McCracken et al., 1996
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 232
- Authors
- Mccracken, L. M., Gross, R. T., Aikens, J., & Carnrike, C. L. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mccracken, Lance M.
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 927-933
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061757607
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- chronic pain, anxiety, fear, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, pain intensity, disability, pain behavior, instrument comparison
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Personality Inventory, Low Back Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review