Effect of worrisome and relaxing thinking on fearful emotional processing
Abstract
This study replicated and extended previous data suggesting that worry inhibits emotional processing of fearful imagery. Female participants categorized as either victimization-fearful (N = 24) or victimization and speech-fearful (N = 27) completed trials of worrisome or relaxing thinking and tone-cued imagery. For each trial, participants engaged in 30 s of relaxing or worrisome (speech or victimization) thinking and then imagined speech or victimization fear scenes for 15 s. Heart rate and facial electromyography activity at the corrugator supercilii region were measured during the think and imagery periods to estimate degree of emotional processing of the fear imagery. Consistent with earlier findings, there was greater heart rate suppression during fearful imagery after a period of worry as opposed to relaxation. This finding, however, may have been the result of physiological differences between worrisome and relaxation thinking. Corrugator activation during thinking showed a similar pattern as the heart rate data while corrugator activation during fearful imagery was dependent on the baseline employed. These data, in combination with the imagery ratings data, suggest that worry may be an unsuccessful strategy for avoiding the physiological activation associated with emotional processing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When a pre-worry resting baseline is used as the comparison point, there is no muting effect of worry on reactivity to fear stimuli.
“When a pre-worry resting baseline is used as the comparison point, there is no muting effect of worry on reactivity to fear stimuli (Peasley-Miklus & Vrana, 2000; Stapinski et al., 2010; Vrana et al., 1986, 1989).”
From A novel theory of experiential avoidance in generalized anxiety disorder: A review and synthesis of research supporting a contrast avoidance model of worry (2011) · cites this paper as Peasley-Miklus & Vrana, 2000
Evidence that prior worry precludes further reactivity to fearful and sadness-inducing stimuli suggests that a central aspect of emotional processing of negative affect is eliminated by chronic worry.
“Evidence that prior worry precludes further reactivity to fearful and sadness-inducing stimuli (Borkovec & Hu, 1990; Llera & Newman, 2010a; Peasley-Miklus & Vrana, 2000; Vrana et al., 1986, 1989) suggests that a central aspect of emotional processing of negative affect is eliminated by chronic worry.”
From A novel theory of experiential avoidance in generalized anxiety disorder: A review and synthesis of research supporting a contrast avoidance model of worry (2011) · cites this paper as Peasley-Miklus & Vrana, 2000
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 20 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Peasley-Miklus, C., & Vrana, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- ORCID
- Vrana, Scott R
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-144
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026699660
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- worry, relaxation, fear, emotional processing, heart rate, corrugator supercilii, facial electromyography
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Eidetic Imagery, Fear, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Relaxation, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review