The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The P1′ specificity of tobacco etch virus protease
Open accessAbstract
Affinity tags have become indispensable tools for protein expression and purification. Yet, because they have the potential to interfere with structural and functional studies, it is usually desirable to remove them from the target protein. The stringent sequence specificity of the tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease has made it a useful reagent for this purpose. However, a potential limitation of TEV protease is that it is believed to require a Gly or Ser residue in the P1' position of its substrates to process them with reasonable efficiency. Consequently, after an N-terminal affinity tag is removed by TEV protease, the target protein will usually retain a non-native Ser or Gly residue on its N-terminus, and in some cases this may affect its biological activity. To investigate the stringency of the requirement for Gly or Ser in the P1' position of a TEV protease recognition site, we constructed 20 variants of a fusion protein substrate with an otherwise optimal recognition site, each containing a different amino acid in the P1' position. The efficiency with which these fusion proteins were processed by TEV protease was compared both in vivo and in vitro. Additionally, the kinetic parameters K(M) and k(cat) were determined for a representative set of peptide substrates with amino acid substitutions in the P1' position. The results indicate that many side-chains can be accommodated in the P1' position of a TEV protease recognition site with little impact on the efficiency of processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges
Rosano, G. L., & Ceccarelli, E. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172 · Cited by 2,556
The genetic design of signaling cascades to record receptor activation
Barnea, G., Strapps, W., Herrada, G., Berman, Y., Ong, J., Kloss, B., Axel, R., & Lee, K. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710487105 · Cited by 678
Strategies to Optimize Protein Expression in E. coli
Francis, D. M., & Page, R. (2010) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/0471140864.ps0524s61 · Cited by 272
Oberst, A., Pop, C., Tremblay, A. G., Blais, V., Denault, J.-B., Salvesen, G. S., & Green, D. R. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.095083 · Cited by 214
Robotic cloning and protein production platform of the northeast structural genomics consortium
Acton, T. B., Gunsalus, K. C., Xiao, R., Ma, L. C., Aramini, J., Baran, M. C., Chiang, Y.-W., Climent, T., Cooper, B., Denissova, N. G., et al. (2005) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(05)94008-1 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Kapust, R. B., Tözsér, J., Copeland, T. D., & Waugh, D. S.
- Venue
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 294
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 949-955
- ISSN
- 0006-291X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161323536
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The P1′ specificity of tobacco etch virus protease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-291x(02)00574-0
- The paper
- Kapust, R. B., Tözsér, J., Copeland, T. D., & Waugh, D. S. (2002). The P1′ specificity of tobacco etch virus protease. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(02)00574-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.