Cited by 237Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchStress Responses and Cortisol

Decreased hippocampal N-acetylaspartate in the absence of atrophy in posttraumatic stress disorder

Open access
Schuff, Norbert, Neylan, Thomas C., Lenoci, Maryanne A., Du, An-Tao, Weiss, Daniel S., Marmar, Charles R., Weiner, Michael W.·2001·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Previous magnetic resonance imaging studies of posttraumatic stress disorder reported hippocampal volume loss. The goals of this study were 1) to determine the relationship between hippocampal atrophy and posttraumatic stress disorder in the absence of alcohol abuse, and 2) to test if loss of N-acetylaspartate (a neuron marker) in the hippocampus of posttraumatic stress disorder occurs separate from atrophy. In addition, volume changes in the entorhinal cortex were also explored. Methods Eighteen male patients with combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (mean age 51.2 +/- 2.5 years) and 19 male control subjects (mean age 51.8 +/- 3.2 years) were studied using magnetic resonance imaging and Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Both groups had no alcohol and drug abuse during the past 5 years. Results Posttraumatic stress disorder and control subjects had similar volumes of hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. In contrast to volume, N-acetylaspartate was significantly reduced by about 23% bilaterally in the hippocampus of posttraumatic stress disorder when compared with control subjects, and creatine-containing compounds were reduced by 26% in the right hippocampus of posttraumatic stress disorder. Conclusions N-acetyl asparate and creatine reductions imply that there are hippocampal abnormalities in posttraumatic stress disorder. Furthermore, these metabolite changes seem to be better indicators of posttraumatic stress disorder pathology than volume losses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01245-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 237

Authors
Schuff, N., Neylan, T. C., Lenoci, M. A., Du, A.-T., Weiss, D. S., Marmar, C. R., & Weiner, M. W.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Schuff, Norbert
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-12
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
952-959
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969969013
Cited by
237
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG010897)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, hippocampus, N-acetylaspartate, hippocampal atrophy, entorhinal cortex, creatine, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, combat-related PTSD, brain metabolites, neuronal loss
MeSH terms
Aspartic Acid, Atrophy, Brain, Creatine, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review