Decreased hippocampal N-acetylaspartate in the absence of atrophy in posttraumatic stress disorder
Open accessAbstract
Background Previous magnetic resonance imaging studies of posttraumatic stress disorder reported hippocampal volume loss. The goals of this study were 1) to determine the relationship between hippocampal atrophy and posttraumatic stress disorder in the absence of alcohol abuse, and 2) to test if loss of N-acetylaspartate (a neuron marker) in the hippocampus of posttraumatic stress disorder occurs separate from atrophy. In addition, volume changes in the entorhinal cortex were also explored. Methods Eighteen male patients with combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (mean age 51.2 +/- 2.5 years) and 19 male control subjects (mean age 51.8 +/- 3.2 years) were studied using magnetic resonance imaging and Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Both groups had no alcohol and drug abuse during the past 5 years. Results Posttraumatic stress disorder and control subjects had similar volumes of hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. In contrast to volume, N-acetylaspartate was significantly reduced by about 23% bilaterally in the hippocampus of posttraumatic stress disorder when compared with control subjects, and creatine-containing compounds were reduced by 26% in the right hippocampus of posttraumatic stress disorder. Conclusions N-acetyl asparate and creatine reductions imply that there are hippocampal abnormalities in posttraumatic stress disorder. Furthermore, these metabolite changes seem to be better indicators of posttraumatic stress disorder pathology than volume losses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are no consistent results for hippocampal volume in PTSD.
“No consistent results MRI: Schuff et al. (2001); Pederson et al. (2004); Jatzko et al. (2006) fMRI: Fennema-Notestine et al. (2002)”
From Neuroimaging research in posttraumatic stress disorder – Focus on amygdala, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (2019) · cites this paper as Schuff et al. (2001)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 237
- Authors
- Schuff, N., Neylan, T. C., Lenoci, M. A., Du, A.-T., Weiss, D. S., Marmar, C. R., & Weiner, M. W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schuff, Norbert
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 952-959
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2733624
- OpenAlex
- W1969969013
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 17.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG010897)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, hippocampus, N-acetylaspartate, hippocampal atrophy, entorhinal cortex, creatine, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, combat-related PTSD, brain metabolites, neuronal loss
- MeSH terms
- Aspartic Acid, Atrophy, Brain, Creatine, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review