Cited by 84Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Reduction of cocaine place preference in mice lacking the protein phosphatase 1 inhibitors DARPP 32 or Inhibitor 1

Zachariou, Venetia, Benoit-Marand, Marianne, Allen, Patrick B, Ingrassia, Peter, Fienberg, Allen A, Gonon, Francois, Greengard, Paul, Picciotto, Marina R·2002·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Modulation of protein phosphorylation by dopamine is thought to play an important role in drug reward. Protein phosphatase-1 (PP-1) is known to mediate some of the changes in neuronal signaling that occur following activation of the dopaminergic system.Methods Two endogenous inhibitors of PP-1 are dopamine and cyclic 3', 5' adenosine monophosphate-regulated phosphoprotein (DARPP-32) and Inhibitor-1 (I-1). Knockout mice lacking one or both of these PP-1 inhibitors were tested for responses to cocaine using in vivo amperometry and conditioned place preference.Results Presynaptic dopaminergic function appears to be unaffected by these mutations because stimulation-evoked changes in extracellular dopamine levels were unchanged between wild type mice and mice lacking one or both of these PP-1 inhibitors. In contrast, conditioned place preference to cocaine is reduced in mice lacking DARPP-32, I-1, or both phosphoproteins. This does not appear to be due to a learning deficit because mice lacking both DARPP-32 and I-1 show normal passive avoidance learning.Conclusions These data imply that increased PP-1 function as a result of deficits in DARPP-32 or I-1 is sufficient to decrease the rewarding properties of cocaine. Furthermore, the mechanism for this altered cocaine place preference does not involve alteration of dopamine release or reuptake.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01318-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 84

Metadata

Authors
Zachariou, V., Benoit-Marand, M., Allen, P. B., Ingrassia, P., Fienberg, A. A., Gonon, F., Greengard, P., & Picciotto, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Rockefeller University (US)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
612-620
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970290214
Cited by
84
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 08227, DA10044, P01DA010044, DA 00436, P01DA008227)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
cocaine, conditioned place preference, protein phosphatase 1, DARPP-32, inhibitor-1, dopamine, drug reward, knockout mice, presynaptic dopamine release, passive avoidance learning, protein phosphorylation
MeSH terms
Animals, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Animal, Cocaine, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Electric Stimulation, Electrochemistry, Male, Motor Activity, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Phosphoprotein Phosphatases, Phosphoproteins, Proteins, Mice, Knockout, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Mice, Dopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32, Protein Phosphatase 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review