Oxytocin, vasopressin, and autism: Is there a connection?
Abstract
Autism is a poorly understood developmental disorder characterized by social impairment, communication deficits, and compulsive behavior. The authors review evidence from animal studies demonstrating that the nonapeptides, oxytocin and vasopressin, have unique effects on the normal expression of species-typical social behavior, communication, and rituals. Based on this evidence, they hypothesize that an abnormality in oxytocin or vasopressin neurotransmission may account for several features of autism. As autism appears to be a genetic disorder, mutations in the various peptide, peptide receptor, or lineage-specific developmental genes could lead to altered oxytocin or vasopressin neurotransmission. Many of these genes have been cloned and sequenced, and several polymorphisms have been identified. Recent gene targeting studies that alter expression of either the peptides or their receptors in the rodent brain partially support the autism hypothesis. While previous experience suggests caution in hypothesizing a cause or suggesting a treatment for autism, the available preclinical evidence with oxytocin and vasopressin recommends the need for clinical studies using gene scanning, pharmacological and neurobiological approaches.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The distribution and density of central OT receptors may be another key factor in understanding the role of OT and related neuropeptides in affiliative behavior.
“In addition to the actual level of OT in the periphery, the distribution and density of central OT receptors may be another key factor in understanding the role of OT and related neuropeptides in affiliative behavior (70,71).”
From Oxytocin and the development of parenting in humans (2010) · cites this paper as [71]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 108 · Cited by 226
- Authors
- Insel, T. R., O’Brien, D. J., & Leckman, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Insel, Thomas R
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-157
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982900778
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, oxytocin, vasopressin, nonapeptide, social behavior, communication difficulties, compulsive behavior, neurotransmission, genetic mutations, genetic polymorphism, gene targeting, animal models of autism
- MeSH terms
- Autistic Disorder, Chromosome Aberrations, Female, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Polymorphism, Genetic, Social Behavior, Vasopressins, Gene Expression, Point Mutation, Chromosome Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review