Cited by 202Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Sleep duration, illumination, and activity patterns in a population sample: effects of gender and ethnicity

Jean-Louis, Girardin, Kripke, Daniel F, Ancoli-Israel, Sonia, Klauber, Melville R, Sepulveda, Raul S·2000·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Current knowledge of the population's sleep durations emanates primarily from questionnaires and laboratory studies. Using Actillumes, we investigated whether self-reported sleep durations were indicative of a population decline in sleep duration. We also explored illumination and activity patterns.Methods San Diego adults (n = 273, age range: 40-64) were recruited through random telephone calls and were monitored at home while engaging in usual daily routines.Results Volunteers slept an average of 6.22 hours and received an average of 554 lux (environmental illumination). The timing of sleep, illumination, and activity occurred at 2:44, 12:57, and 13:43, respectively. Irrespective of ethnicity, age, and time reference, men received greater illumination than did women, but this gender effect was not independent of work status. Women and men exhibited a similar circadian activity profile; however, women exhibited better sleep-wake patterns. Interactions between gender and ethnicity suggested worse sleep-wake patterns among minority men. An age-related decline in activity was found, but no age trend in sleep duration or illumination patterns was observed.Conclusions This study showed an objective population decline in sleep duration. Sociodemographic effects should be considered in analyses of sleep-wake patterns and illumination exposures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00169-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minority groups, particularly African Americans, have shorter habitual sleep duration and poorer habitual sleep quality based on objectively-measured wrist actigraphy compared to non-Hispanic whites.

    “Minority groups, particularly African Americans, have shorter habitual sleep duration and poorer habitual sleep quality based on objectively-measured wrist actigraphy compared to non-Hispanic whites [11, 12]”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 202

Authors
Jean-Louis, G., Kripke, D. F., Ancoli-Israel, S., Klauber, M. R., & Sepulveda, R. S.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-05
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
921-927
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001493318
Cited by
202
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-02711, R01AG012364, AG-12364, R01AG002711)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL055983, HL 55983)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
sleep duration, ambient light, circadian activity, sleep-wake patterns, gender differences, ethnicity, minority men, home monitoring, actigraphy, employment status
MeSH terms
Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Human Activities, Light, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Sleep, Time Factors, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review