The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Size-Distribution Analysis of Macromolecules by Sedimentation Velocity Ultracentrifugation and Lamm Equation Modeling
Open accessAbstract
A new method for the size-distribution analysis of polymers by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation is described. It exploits the ability of Lamm equation modeling to discriminate between the spreading of the sedimentation boundary arising from sample heterogeneity and from diffusion. Finite element solutions of the Lamm equation for a large number of discrete noninteracting species are combined with maximum entropy regularization to represent a continuous size-distribution. As in the program CONTIN, the parameter governing the regularization constraint is adjusted by variance analysis to a predefined confidence level. Estimates of the partial specific volume and the frictional ratio of the macromolecules are used to calculate the diffusion coefficients, resulting in relatively high-resolution sedimentation coefficient distributions c(s) or molar mass distributions c(M). It can be applied to interference optical data that exhibit systematic noise components, and it does not require solution or solvent plateaus to be established. More details on the size-distribution can be obtained than from van Holde-Weischet analysis. The sensitivity to the values of the regularization parameter and to the shape parameters is explored with the help of simulated sedimentation data of discrete and continuous model size distributions, and by applications to experimental data of continuous and discrete protein mixtures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
Cited by
Zhang, L., Lin, D., Sun, X., Curth, U., Drosten, C., Sauerhering, L., Becker, S., Rox, K., & Hilgenfeld, R. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb3405 · Cited by 2,895
G3BP1 is a tunable switch that triggers phase separation to assemble stress granules
Yang, P., Mathieu, C., Kolaitis, R.-M., Zhang, P., Messing, J., Yurtsever, U., Yang, Z., Wu, J., Li, Y., Pan, Q., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.046 · Cited by 1,249
Discovery of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue semaglutide
Lau, J., Bloch, P., Schäffer, L., Pettersson, I., Spetzler, J., Kofoed, J., Madsen, K., Knudsen, L. B., McGuire, J., Steensgaard, D. B., et al. (2015) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00726 · Cited by 1,105
Cas1–Cas2 complex formation mediates spacer acquisition during CRISPR–Cas adaptive immunity
Nuñez, J. K., Kranzusch, P. J., Noeske, J., Wright, A. V., Davies, C. W., & Doudna, J. A. (2014) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2820 · Cited by 458
Structural basis of CpG and inhibitory DNA recognition by Toll-like receptor 9
Ohto, U., Shibata, T., Tanji, H., Ishida, H., Krayukhina, E., Uchiyama, S., Miyake, K., & Shimizu, T. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14138 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuck, P.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1606-1619
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975317507
- Cited by
- 3,868
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.