Cited by 266Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Hindered diffusion of high molecular weight compounds in brain extracellular microenvironment measured with integrative optical imaging

Open access
Nicholson, C., Tao, L.·1993·Biophysical Journal

Abstract

This paper describes the theory of an integrative optical imaging system and its application to the analysis of the diffusion of 3-, 10-, 40-, and 70-kDa fluorescent dextran molecules in agarose gel and brain extracellular microenvironment. The method uses a precisely defined source of fluorescent molecules pressure ejected from a micropipette, and a detailed theory of the intensity contributions from out-of-focus molecules in a three-dimensional medium to a two-dimensional image. Dextrans tagged with either tetramethylrhodamine or Texas Red were ejected into 0.3% agarose gel or rat cortical slices maintained in a perfused chamber at 34 degrees C and imaged using a compound epifluorescent microscope with a 10 x water-immersion objective. About 20 images were taken at 2-10-s intervals, recorded with a cooled CCD camera, then transferred to a 486 PC for quantitative analysis. The diffusion coefficient in agarose gel, D, and the apparent diffusion coefficient, D*, in brain tissue were determined by fitting an integral expression relating the measured two-dimensional image intensity to the theoretical three-dimensional dextran concentration. The measurements in dilute agarose gel provided a reference value of D and validated the method. Values of the tortuosity, lambda = (D/D*)1/2, for the 3- and 10-kDa dextrans were 1.70 and 1.63, respectively, which were consistent with previous values derived from tetramethylammonium measurements in cortex. Tortuosities for the 40- and 70-kDa dextrans had significantly larger values of 2.16 and 2.25, respectively. This suggests that the extracellular space may have local constrictions that hinder the diffusion of molecules above a critical size that lies in the range of many neurotrophic compounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3495(93)81324-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 266

Authors
Nicholson, C., & Tao, L.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-12
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
2277-2290
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059860021
Cited by
266
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-28642, R01NS028642)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
hindered diffusion, brain extracellular space, fluorescent dextran, agarose gel, diffusion coefficient, tortuosity, apparent diffusion coefficient, tetramethylrhodamine, Texas Red, molecular size dependence
MeSH terms
Animals, Biopolymers, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Dextrans, Diffusion, Extracellular Space, Female, Male, Mathematics, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Neurological, Models, Theoretical, Molecular Weight, Sepharose, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review