The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interaction between diffusion and Michaelis-Menten uptake of dopamine after iontophoresis in striatum
Open accessAbstract
A quantitative description of the behavior of a neurotransmitter in the brain extracellular microenvironment requires an understanding of the relative importance of diffusion versus uptake processes. This paper models the behavior of dopamine released from a small iontophoresis electrode and its voltammetric detection by a carbon fiber sensor 100 microns away as a basis for developing a new paradigm for measuring dopamine kinetics in intact rat neostriatum. The diffusion equation incorporating uptake, characterized by a maximum velocity Vmax and a Michaelis-Menten constant Km, was transformed to an integral equation and solved numerically for the dopamine concentration, C. Analytical solutions were derived for limiting cases of a steady-state free-boundary problem when C >> Km and the linear time-dependent problem when C << Km. These solutions were compared with complete numerical solutions, both for normal uptake (Vmax = 0.2 or 0.8 microM s-1; Km = 0.15 microM), and in the presence of the uptake blocker nomifensine (Km = 6 microM). The results suggest that an experimental strategy for the quantitative analysis of dopamine, and other compounds, in living tissue is to fit a family of concentration versus time curves generated with different iontophoretic current strengths and recorded with a microsensor, to the numerical solution of the diffusion-uptake equation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diffusion in Brain Extracellular Space
Syková, E., & Nicholson, C. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2007 · Cited by 1,481
Self-citationExtracellular space structure revealed by diffusion analysis
Nicholson, C., & Syková, E. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01261-2 · Cited by 914
Self-citationDiffusion and related transport mechanisms in brain tissue
Nicholson, C. (2001) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/64/7/202 · Cited by 490
Self-citationPharmacokinetics of the Carmustine Implant
Fleming, A. B., & Saltzman, W. M. (2002) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200241060-00002 · Cited by 287
Fung, L. K., Shin, M., Tyler, B., Brem, H., & Saltzman, W. M. (1996) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1016083113123 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicholson, C.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1699-1715
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967474964
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction between diffusion and Michaelis-Menten uptake of dopamine after iontophoresis in striatum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3495(95)80348-6
- The paper
- Nicholson, C. (1995). Interaction between diffusion and Michaelis-Menten uptake of dopamine after iontophoresis in striatum. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(95)80348-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.