The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calculated coupling of electron and proton transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis
Open accessAbstract
Based on new Rhodopseudomonas (Rp.) viridis reaction center (RC) coordinates with a reliable structure of the secondary acceptor quinone (QB) site, a continuum dielectric model and finite difference technique have been used to identify clusters of electrostatically interacting ionizable residues. Twenty-three residues within a distance of 25 A from QB (QB cluster) have been shown to be strongly electrostatically coupled to QB, either directly or indirectly. An analogous cluster of 24 residues is found to interact with QA (QA cluster). Both clusters extend to the cytoplasmic surface in at least two directions. However, the QB cluster differs from the QA cluster in that it has a surplus of acidic residues, more strong electrostatic interactions, is less solvated, and experiences a strong positive electrostatic field arising from the polypeptide backbone. Consequently, upon reduction of QA or QB, it is the QB cluster, and not the QA cluster, which is responsible for substoichiometric proton uptake at neutral pH. The bulk of the changes in the QB cluster are calculated to be due to the protonation of a tightly coupled cluster of the three Glu residues (L212, H177, and M234) within the QB cluster. If the lifetime of the doubly reduced state QB2- is long enough, Asp M43 and Ser L223 are predicted to also become protonated. The calculated complex titration behavior of the strongly interacting residues of the QB cluster and the resulting electrostatic response to electron transfer may be a common feature in proton-transferring membrane protein complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Keilin's Respiratory Chain Concept and Its Chemiosmotic Consequences
Mitchell, P. (1979) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.388618 · Cited by 738
Cited by
Implicit Solvation Models: Equilibria, Structure, Spectra, and Dynamics
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (1999) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960149m · Cited by 2,308
Rocchia, W., Alexov, E., & Honig, B. (2001) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp010454y · Cited by 831
Self-citationOn the Quantum Nature of the Shared Proton in Hydrogen Bonds
Tuckerman, M. E., Marx, D., Klein, M. L., & Parrinello, M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5301.817 · Cited by 744
Sham, Y. Y., Chu, Z. T., & Warshel, A. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp963412w · Cited by 356
STRUCTURE AND MEMBRANE ORGANIZATION OF PHOTOSYSTEM II IN GREEN PLANTS
Hankamer, B., Barber, J., & Boekema, E. J. (1997) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.641 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancaster, C. R., Michel, H., Honig, B., & Gunner, M. R.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2469-2492
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071540904
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calculated coupling of electron and proton transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79820-x
- The paper
- Lancaster, C. R., Michel, H., Honig, B., & Gunner, M. R. (1996). Calculated coupling of electron and proton transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79820-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.