Cited by 124Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Persistent and delayed behavioral changes after nicotine treatment in adolescent rats

Trauth, J.A., Seidler, F.J., Slotkin, T.A.·2000·Brain Research

Abstract

Despite the increasing use of tobacco by adolescents, few animal studies have addressed the neurobehavioral consequences of nicotine exposure during this period. We administered nicotine to adolescent rats via continuous infusion on postnatal days (PN) 30 through 47.5, using a dosage regimen that maintains plasma levels similar to those found in smokers or in users of the transdermal nicotine patch. Behavior in a novel open field and learning a passive avoidance task were assessed during nicotine treatment and for 2 weeks post-treatment. On PN44, during nicotine exposure, female rats showed decreased grooming, an effect not seen in males; this effect is opposite to the effects of nicotine in adult rats. Two weeks after cessation of nicotine administration, females showed deficits in locomotor activity and rearing, whereas males again were unaffected; the behavioral deficits appeared at the same age at which gender-selective brain cell damage emerges. In contrast, nicotine exposure enhanced passive avoidance, with the effect intensifying and persisting throughout the post-treatment period. These results reinforce the concept that developmental vulnerability to nicotine extends into adolescence, with patterns of drug effects different from those in earlier or later periods. The correlation of neurochemical with behavioral effects strengthens the connection between adolescent nicotine exposure and persistent functional changes that may influence drug habituation, learning and me…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02823-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescent, but not post-adolescent, treatment with nicotine results in diminished cognitive function as adults, with reduced attention span and enhanced impulsivity.

    “Adolescent, but not post-adolescent, treatment with nicotine has been shown to result in diminished cognitive function as adults with reduced attention span and enhanced impulsivity (Trauth et al. 2000; Counotte et al. 2009; Counotte et al. 2011).”

    From <scp>N</scp> icotine and the adolescent brain (2015) · cites this paper as Trauth et al. 2000

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 124

Authors
Trauth, J. A., Seidler, F. J., & Slotkin, T. A.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Slotkin, T.A.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-10
Volume
880
Issue
1-2
Pages
167-172
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984566137
Cited by
124
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
adolescent nicotine exposure, nicotine, developmental vulnerability, sex differences, grooming, locomotor activity, passive avoidance, learning and memory, neurobehavioral effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Female, Grooming, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Nicotine, Sex Characteristics, Smoking, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review