Cited by 96Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Stimulation of NTS activates NMDA and non-NMDA receptors in rat cardiac vagal neurons in the nucleus ambiguus.

Neff, R.A, Mihalevich, M, Mendelowitz, D·1998·Brain Research

Abstract

While it is widely accepted that tonic and reflex changes in cardiac vagal activity play significant roles in cardiovascular function, little is known about the synaptic pathways in the brainstem responsible for the control of cardiac vagal neurons in the nucleus ambiguus (NA). In this study, we identified the principal post-synaptic receptors activated in cardiac vagal neurons upon stimulation of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS). Cardiac vagal neurons were identified by the presence of a retrograde fluorescent tracer and were visualized in rat brainstem slices. Perforated patch clamp techniques were used to record post-synaptic currents. NTS stimulation activated glutamatergic currents in cardiac vagal neurons with a typical delay of 8-18 ms. Post-synaptic responses were separated into NMDA and non-NMDA components using D-2-amino-5-phophonovalerate (AP5) and 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2, 3-dione (CNQX), respectively. In conclusion, this study characterizes a monosynaptic glutamatergic pathway from NTS that activates NMDA and kainate/AMPA post-synaptic receptors in cardiac vagal neurons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00149-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 96

Authors
Neff, R. A., Mihalevich, M., & Mendelowitz, D.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Mendelowitz, D
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
792
Issue
2
Pages
277-282
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112879412
Cited by
96
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 49965)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
nucleus tractus solitarius, nucleus ambiguus, cardiac vagal neurons, NMDA receptor, non-NMDA receptors, kainate receptors, AMPA receptors, glutamatergic neurotransmission, monosynaptic pathway, postsynaptic currents, AP5, CNQX
MeSH terms
Animals, Heart, Neurons, Organ Culture Techniques, Parasympathetic Nervous System, Vagus Nerve, 2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Solitary Nucleus, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, 6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review